There is of course a matter of repo size, but more importantly is the fact that the code is in an incubation repository where they want to use it in production.
On 2012-08-23, at 1:47 AM, Ian Bull wrote: No problem here, but is the issue that the incubator repository (I assume it's a single repo) is too large / complex? If so, then moving it to the p2 repo won't help much (as you said) :-).
cheers,
ian On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for your interest in p2CUDF. Moving it out of where it is located should not be too much of an issue. I will discuss with the others if they prefer having the code moved into a specific git repo or merged with the existing p2 repo, and will check with the foundation if any process needs to be followed.
For the repo structure, given how large the p2 repository is (both in size and number of projects) I'm in favour of creating a specific repo. Ian, Tom, any problems with that?
Pascal
On 2012-08-20, at 4:44 AM, Adrien Lecharpentier wrote: Hello,
For an open-source project named DORM, we would like to use the library p2cudf from the incubation repository.
It would be great for this project to be hosted in its own repository git or svn so we could easily use it and maybe contribute to it.
Thanks in advance!
-- Adrien
--
Adrien Lecharpentier Consultant et Formateur Zenika, Paris | |
|
Tél: +33 (0)6 28 55 08 51
Skype: adrien.lecharpentier
_______________________________________________ p2-dev mailing list p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
-- R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource
|