|Re: [p2-dev] Performance tests in the normal test bucket?|
Those tests came into existence when I introduced the p2 query
evaluator. The main purpose was proof of concept, that the use of an
evaluator could bring better performance than most hand coded
queries had done in the past. For that they have played out its role
but I agree with John, they might still come in handy for reference.
They were never intended to be proper performance tests.|
On 2011-09-01 16:03, John Arthorne wrote:
Some of these tests are just comparing two different ways of doing things against each other (testAVersusBPerformance tests). These ones wouldn't make sense as proper performance tests. They could probably be removed, although they might sometimes come in handy for reference. Some of them look like micro-benchmarks that wouldn't be helpful as proper performance tests, but some could probably could be turned into proper performance tests with baselines, etc. In particular benchmarks of slicer, resolver, and reconciler performance would be really useful to guard against regressions.