[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [p2-dev] Publisher Refactorings - Copyright notices
- From: Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:46:51 -0500
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
Yep, this is good
On 2011-02-22, at 8:45 AM, Oberlies, Tobias wrote:
> For the publisher refactorings, I'm wondering which changes are worth an entry in the copyright notice header. From what I understand, only significant changes should be listed.
> For the things we have done up to now, I'd draw the following line:
> - Add contribution entry for:
> 1. org.eclipse.pde.publishing/build.properties - not much in there, so changing the bundleName is kind of significant
> 2. /org.eclipse.equinox.p2.publisher/src/org/eclipse/equinox/spi/p2/publisher/PublisherHelper.java and
> /org.eclipse.equinox.p2.updatesite/src/org/eclipse/equinox/internal/p2/updatesite/RemoteFeaturesAction.java - moved one public (plus one private) method from the former to the latter
> - Don't change copyright notice for:
> a. all files that have just been moved.
> b. all files where only imports (e.g. the Activator) changed.
> c. technical files (like MANIFEST.MF) that don't have copyright notices
> Does this comply with Eclipse's IP policy?
> p2-dev mailing list