Re: [p2-dev] Changes on p2.discovery

[Daniel Pastore <kpqb38@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Pascal,

In this case, should I be looking at the code in the branch I pointed (/cvsroot/rt/branches/R3_6_maintenance)?

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 16:29, Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have not yet. I just had the time to  verify the behaviour in the Java Developer package and it is not broken (when used by Mylyn).
I assume this is something on your end.

On 2011-02-03, at 1:17 PM, Daniel Pastore wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to fix our Pulsar code to use the P2 code for SR2.
> I should be looking at /cvsroot/rt/branches/R3_6_maintenance, right?
>
> Pascal, have you had any progress on the bug I opened?
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Pastore
> Sequoyah Team
>

> _______________________________________________
> p2-dev mailing list
> p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

--
Thanks,

Daniel Pastore

Sequoyah Team