Re: [p2-dev] Pack200 and Canonical Descriptor Issue

[Marcus R Kestler <marcus.kestler@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Are you sure it is valid? One example I see is:

<artifact classifier='osgi.bundle' id='org.eclipse.m2m.qvt.oml.common' version='2.1.0.v20091205-0148'>
<properties size='4'>
<property name='artifact.size' value='81755'/>
<property name='download.size' value='81755'/>
<property name='download.md5' value='bb7c21d7d912a5590d85d95f742f29e4'/>
<property name='download.contentType' value='application/zip'/>
</properties>
</artifact>

Which has no corresponding plugin jar. There are many of these for various bundles. Sorry, my links before were one level too low.

http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/qvtoml/updates/milestones/

---------------------------------------------
Marcus Kestler
Advisory Software Engineer
IBM Rational Capilano Group
---------------------------------------------

Pascal Rapicault ---03/16/2010 11:56:46 AM---You are being lied to. p2 does not produce such repositories. Judging from previous discussions thro

From:	Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	P2 developer discussions <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	03/16/2010 11:56 AM
Subject:	Re: [p2-dev] Pack200 and Canonical Descriptor Issue
Sent by:	p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

You are being lied to. p2 does not produce such repositories. Judging from previous discussions through bug reports, I believe this results from the modeling build infrastructure that runs some a script of its own that strip out the canonical artifacts. 
That said this repository seems to be valid.

On 2010-03-16, at 11:45 AM, Marcus R Kestler wrote:

Hi,
We are seeing a lot of P2 artifact repositories being produced that have only pack200 files in them. In the P2 artifact repository file, it still has an artifact descriptor for a canonical version of the artifact. Trying to get this canonical descriptor produces an exception.
The teams who own these claim that the P2 tooling is producing this. I had assumed they were just deleting their jar files. Does P2 do this? Will it add a canonical, invalid artifact descriptor when it produces a pack200 only repository?
Two examples of what I'm referring to are here:

http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/qvtoml/updates/milestones/plugins/
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/ocl/3_0/updates/milestones/plugins/


Thanks.

---------------------------------------------
Marcus Kestler
Advisory Software Engineer
IBM Rational Capilano Group
---------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev