[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF

I got this information from Scott Lewis:

There haven't been any changes to the file transfer bundles between yesterday and today. The changes that Pascal found were between May 27th and yesterday's builds...e.g. here's the complete list:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278148
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278222
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278093
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277958

They all went through our published review process, testing, etc.

The only change made over past 24 hours was to one of our UI bundles:
org.eclipse.ecf.ui.capabilities...to fix a problem with our own capabilities setup for Galileo:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=279007

Having the platform use today's version, rather than the version done yesterday will save us some trouble (on Monday next) for our next Galileo contribution because of the Galileo build problem.

Scott



Inactive hide details for Mike Wilson ---06/04/2009 04:07:05 PM---We need to understand the nature of these changes. It is too Mike Wilson ---06/04/2009 04:07:05 PM---We need to understand the nature of these changes. It is too late for us to be taking new versions of *anything* that could bus


From:

Mike Wilson <Mike_Wilson@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Cc:

"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

06/04/2009 04:07 PM

Subject:

Re: [platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF




We need to understand the nature of these changes. It is too late for us to be taking new versions of *anything* that could bust our stability or invalidate our testing.

ECF team, please elucidate.

McQ.

Inactive hide details for Pascal Rapicault---04/06/2009 16:44:48---I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 2Pascal Rapicault---04/06/2009 16:44:48---I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 27th and have found 3 code changes in three plugins that *are* affec

From:

Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA

To:

"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc:

platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

04/06/2009 16:44

Subject:

Re: [platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF




I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 27th and have found 3 code changes in three plugins that *are* affected by the platform
ContainerFactory in org.eclipse.ecf
Activator in org.eclipse.ecf.identity
AbstractRetrieveFileTransfer org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer

>The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform
Who do I trust? Now I'm worried.

Is there a bug report backing any of these changes? Why now?

PaScaL

Inactive hide details for Jeff McAffer ---06/04/2009 04:18:57 PM---+1Jeff McAffer ---06/04/2009 04:18:57 PM---+1

From:

Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

Cc:

"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

06/04/2009 04:18 PM

Subject:

[platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF




+1

The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform. The only reason we have to get a new contirbutuion is because the qualifiers changed. That issue will be addressed in ECF build in the future. This will be the last ECF contribution related to the platform's use.

Jeff

Pascal Rapicault wrote:

GIF image

GIF image