[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: Fw: [p2-dev] Using the new "sofware site" target provisioner
|
Let's chat about this at this afternoon p2 call (last topic!). For those interested in this optional part of the call, please review https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272750 and have an opinion ready :)
![Inactive hide details for Ian Bull ---05/02/2009 10:42:05 PM---The PDE team loves patches. Can you attach it to this bug where]()
Ian Bull ---05/02/2009 10:42:05 PM---The PDE team loves patches. Can you attach it to this bug where we're looking at spoofing the JRE profile at the moment?
![]()
From: | ![]()
Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
P2 developer discussions <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
05/02/2009 10:42 PM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
Re: Fw: [p2-dev] Using the new "sofware site" target provisioner |
The PDE team loves patches. Can you attach it to this bug where we're looking at spoofing the JRE profile at the moment?
I'm a bit curious what the main difference would be when not using the planner. What do we lose.
I think this is covered in Jeff's comments on 272750, but essentially we would be replacing target provisioning with target mirroring. Instead of pointing to a repo and provisioning it (installing an IU and everything that "satisfies" it), you would point to a repo and "mirror" it to your target.
You would then be able to develop against everything in the repo, and nothing more.
cheers,
ian
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
