Apparently, the license is
present in both the IU that represents the
feature group and the IU that represents the feature jar. The latter
however, does not seem to be subject to translation.
Personally, I think the feature.jar should contain no such thing as
license, copyright, description etc. since it's just an intermediate IU
representing the physical jar of the feature. I can open a bugzilla and
provide a patch if that's the general opinion.
Susan Franklin McCourt wrote:
this is intentional from the UI point of view.
Some additional info.
We look through every single IU in the provisioning plan, and if it has
a license, we must show it.
See bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=218532
So then the question becomes...how are we mapping a feature's license
to the metadata generated by the publisher?
The feature in question is generated using the FeatureAction in the new
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> I see a somewhat strange symptom in the UI. I select a feature for
> install and "Next" for the Review screen (here I see only that
> feature) and then "Next" again to the "Review Licenses" screen.
> see two entries. One is the feature that I selected, the other one
> apparently the UI that represents its jar (it ends with
> ".feature.jar"). The latter doesn't really show a license, just
> text "license".
> But why do I see the ".feature.jar" UI here at all?
> Thomas Hallgren
p2-dev mailing list