[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [p2-dev] ecf feature?

Hi Scott :)
I think we are fine with the setup as-is, sounds like p2 got it all
covered :)
I guess I was thinking in p1 terms here, where only included plug-ins
would be considered part of a feature, and the dependencies were a
slightly different matter..
HTH,
Ciao, hh 

-----Original Message-----
From: p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Scott Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:57 PM
To: P2 developer discussions
Subject: Re: [p2-dev] ecf feature?

Hi Helmut,

We could, upon request, create an ECF feature for distributing just the
filetransfer bundles (i.e. those used by p2/SDK).  But we're only going
to do it if it's something people actually want as it means extra
Galileo releng work for us (and we have enough already).

Scott

Haigermoser, Helmut wrote:
> Ciao Pascal :)
> So, in order to get a group that requires ecf one could either
> - include the ecf plug-in in a feature or
> - include a dependency on the plug-in in the feature ?
> Also, there is no ECF group then, right, ecf will appear below the 
> p2.ui group only?
>
> I'm totally fine with the solution, just curious... :) Helmut
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Pascal Rapicault
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: P2 developer discussions
> Cc: P2 developer discussions; p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [p2-dev] ecf feature?
>
> The ECF plug-ins are required with a range (versus being included) by 
> the p2 feature.
> Therefore the dependencies are here and p2 will properly bring down 
> the necessary pieces.
> We did that to avoid blocking the ECF team with one particular
version.
> That said we are still looking at expressing an optional dependency on

> our favorite version of ECF. We would likely do this using a p2.inf.
>
> PaSaL
>
> Inactive hide details for "Haigermoser, Helmut" ---04/01/2009 10:14:57

> AM---Ciao Guys :) Just had a look at M6, looks like ther"Haigermoser, 
> Helmut" ---04/01/2009 10:14:57 AM---Ciao Guys :) Just had a look at 
> M6, looks like there is no feature listing ecf, is
>
>
>
> From:	
> "Haigermoser, Helmut" <Helmut.Haigermoser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>	
>
> To:	
> "P2 developer discussions" <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>	
>
> Date:	
> 04/01/2009 10:14 AM	
>
> Subject:	
> [p2-dev] ecf feature?	
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> Ciao Guys :)
> Just had a look at M6, looks like there is no feature listing ecf, is 
> this OK or should I raise a bugzilla?
> The p2.ui feature has a dependency on ecf plug-ins but that's the only

> point where ecf is mentioned in any feature.xml in the SDK...
>
> This leads to a more general question, features translate into groups 
> in p2, how do we maintain this knowledge if not by keeping features as

> a whole concept around for the time being, is p2.inf gonna fill this 
> blank maybe?
>
> TIA,
> Ciao, hh
> _______________________________________________
> p2-dev mailing list
> p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2-dev mailing list
> p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
>   

_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev