[p2-dev] Use of ProvisionException.REPOSITORY_NOT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[p2-dev] Use of ProvisionException.REPOSITORY_NOT_FOUND?

From: Henrik Lindberg <henrik.lindberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:01:08 +0100
Delivered-to: p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/p2-dev>
List-help: <mailto:p2-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev>, <mailto:p2-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev>, <mailto:p2-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

When testing repository loading and using invalid URI's to test errors- tests fail if the Status.getCode() is not REPOSITORY_NOT_FOUND.I saw one comment that said that "this status code is expected, sinceall others will be logged".

I wonder how the status codes should be used? There are codes forACCESS denied, INVALID location, etc. Wouldn't it be more appropriateto use those when thecause is known? I now have statuses with more details working, and Iselected what I thought were suitable codes from ProvisionExceptiononly to find that tests fail...


Can someone shed some light on how it is supposed to work?

Henrik Lindberg
henrik.lindberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [p2-dev] Use of ProvisionException.REPOSITORY_NOT_FOUND?
  - From: John Arthorne

References:
- Re: [p2-dev] To update cache or not update cache?
  - From: DJ Houghton

Prev by Date: [p2-dev] tagged p2 for I20090312-0100
Next by Date: Re: [p2-dev] Product without executable
Previous by thread: Re: [p2-dev] To update cache or not update cache?
Next by thread: Re: [p2-dev] Use of ProvisionException.REPOSITORY_NOT_FOUND?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs