[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ormf-dev] ORMF Model
|
Yes, you are absolutely right. B. and I have been busy finishing up
our contracts, both of which end mid this week. What time I have had
has gone into completing the refactoring of the server and getting the
client running against it. This as you know is done and I will be
posting instructions today if anyone is interested in running it.
So we will soon be turning our attention back to the model. We have
made good progress, but there is a long ways to go.
B. and I felt that the next step was for us to sit down and review all
of the suggesting and carefully evaluate the pros and cons of each.
Hopefully from this we can start synthesising the next proposal which
should include a bit more flesh, but not too much. We would welcome
others to do the same so that over the next week or two we can move
forward together to the next level.
Thanks,
Joel
On 25 Jan 2009, at 10:35, Ingenieurbüro Ponikwar (ORMF) wrote:
Hi everyone on the ORMF list,
the discussions on the ORMF model (see http://wiki.eclipse.org/Requirements_Model)
have run silent for a couple of weeks now, since the last comment
was posted.
How are we going to proceed? Do we have any due dates or deadlines
to meet (even if they are only our own)? What is the preferred way
forward?
Kind regards,
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
ormf-dev mailing list
ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev
