[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ormf-dev] Jaxen woes
|
That's superb Achim, thanks.
Now the question is whether we want to take the short quick and dirty
path or go for the long term solution. I really prefer to have that
conversation with the framework that there is actually a choice so
your investigations are of great value at least to me :-)
I was really hoping that more conversation would have been spawned by
my prior threads around architecture and resources/skills. So I guess
I will prod one last time to see if anyone would like to add anything
to either of the these threads. If not I will open a new thread to
discuss the direction forward early next week.
Many thanks,
Joel
On 15 Aug 2008, at 12:16, Achim Loerke wrote:
Hi all
I've looked into replacing Jaxen in dom4j. Attached are my thoughts
on the problem.
If we decide to go the route I proposed and no one thinks "That's
exactly in my line of work" I'd do the suggested work myself.
Achim
--
BREDEX GmbH
Mauernstr. 33
38100 Braunschweig
Tel.: +49-531-24330-0
Fax: +49-531-24330-99
http: www.bredex.de
Geschäftsführer: Hans-J. Brede, Achim Lörke, Ulrich Obst
Amtsgericht Braunschweig HRB 2450
<
Jaxen
.pdf><Achim_Loerke.vcf>_______________________________________________
ormf-dev mailing list
ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev