[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ormf-dev] Re: Technology SVN.
|
Not sure why the original indentation get lost. Here it is again.
trunk/
plugins/
framework
useme
...
documentation
...
branches
tags
On 16 Aug 2008, at 15:27, Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
Hi Matt,
All is fine with our write access to SVN now, thanks. I have found,
however, that it is no longer possible to see dev.eclipse.org/
svnroot/technology using committer nor anonymous credentials. This
is true from both with Eclipse or web access; in fact the link to
technology is now broken on http://wiki.eclipse.org/SVN_Howto .
I would like to ask your assistance with the following even though I
know that strictly speaking it may fall outside of your area. I am
asking you because in the end of the day it may affect the integrity
of the ORMF repository and that does concern you.
I would like to set up our repository layout thus:
trunk/
plugins/
framework
useme
...
documentation
...
branches
tags
Notice that "trunk", branches and tags are sitting at the top. The
only way I can get the Subversion tool to create this is as shown in
the screenshot below. I do not think that using "Name on Repository"
to control the structure is proper, but all other configuration of
the wizard produce what I consider to be bazaar layouts. Is this
simply an idiosyncrasy of the wizard or will this actually create
any undesired metadata in the repository.
Many thanks,
Joel
<pastedGraphic.tiff>
On 14 Aug 2008, at 15:09, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:
Hi folks,
Thanks for the confirmation. I've moved your repo into location,
so you should be able to connect to dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/
technology/org.eclipse.ormf and commit code via https or svn+ssh.
If you have problems Joel please let me know and we'll see what's
happening.
-Matt.
Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
Hi Matt,
Yes that is correct for ORMF. In fact I sent you and email over
the weekend asking for assistance as I cannot commit to the
repository...but that's another story ;-)
Anything else I can help with, please let me know.
Cheers,
Joel
On 13 Aug 2008, at 18:58, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need a sanity check and I think you're the only people that can
help. As I investigate our current outage I keep bumping into
your repositories since they all appear to be 'empty' ie: having
nothing more in them than the initial commit to create them and
maybe one or two other things. Is that accurate? I know that
ORMF is very new, but the rest of you have been around for a
while, is there little to no code activity?
-Matt.
--
Eclipse WebMaster - webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx
Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster
--
Eclipse WebMaster - webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx
Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster
_______________________________________________
ormf-dev mailing list
ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev