Re: [ormf-dev] Project meta data is out of date for technology.ormf

[Anne Jacko <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just to make the discussion more interesting, Bjorn suggested 0.1 or  
0.2. Sounds to me like you have the option to use whatever seems  
reasonable based on the maturity of the code...

Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx




On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Barbara Rosi-Schwartz wrote:

> Good info indeed, thanks Rich!
>
> B.
>
> On 5 Aug 2008, at 18:32, Richard Gronback wrote:
>
> > Assuming this was good info, thanks :)
> >
> >
> > On 8/5/08 1:28 PM, "Anne Jacko" <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Good job being a mentor, Rich!
> > >
> > > Anne Jacko
> > > emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Richard Gronback wrote:
> > >
> > > > You could consider aligning yourselves with the Galileo release  
> > > > next
> > > > June
> > > > (the "train").  In that case, the tentative dates are here
> > > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Galileo_Simultaneous_Release
> > > >
> > > > The number depends upon how close you feel you are to having a 1.0
> > > > release
> > > > (exiting incubation).  If you feel the code base is near 1.0
> > > > quality, I'd
> > > > say go with 0.9 for the first.  I've noticed several projects using
> > > > 0.8 or
> > > > 0.7 as well (even lower).  Of course, you could be optimistic and
> > > > shoot for
> > > > a 1.0.0 with Galileo, then combine your graduation review with a
> > > > release
> > > > review ;)
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > Rich
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/5/08 1:16 PM, "Barbara Rosi-Schwartz" <Barbara.Rosi-Schwartz@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Anne.
> > > > >
> > > > > We just got the reminder below. While I am fixing a number of meta
> > > > > data, the next/future release is a bit of a quandary for us at the
> > > > > moment. We are currently figuring out real resources and making  
> > > > > up a
> > > > > plan, so for the time being we do not have a release date. Would  
> > > > > it
> > > > > be
> > > > > possible to let this particular piece of information be for the  
> > > > > time
> > > > > being?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, we do not know what a typical release name/number is for the
> > > > > very first release of a project in incubation.  Any suggestion?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks as always,
> > > > > B.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5 Aug 2008, at 18:00, portal on behalf of emo wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Barbara, Joel,
> > > > > > Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the
> > > > > > MyFoundation
> > > > > > Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were
> > > > > > found
> > > > > > with this project's meta-data:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * There is no next/future release of this project. All Eclipse
> > > > > > projects
> > > > > > must have a "next release" planned and scheduled.
> > > > > > * There is no 'projecturl' pointing to the project home page
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > ormf-dev mailing list
> > > > > > ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > ormf-dev mailing list
> > > > > ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev