[orbit-dev] Fw: Committer election under way that's not needed ....

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Just so everyone knows .... 

Thanks to Matt for "manually"
intervening with databases to cancel the voting processes for Jens (who
was already a committer)  ... just wanted  to be sure everyone
knew why .... and didn't start it over again :) 

Jens, you may want to "test access"
before you "really need it" just to confirm all is well (but,
I'm sure it will be). 

Thanks all for your contributions, including
your eagerness to add new committers. 


----- Forwarded by David
M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 05/28/2014 04:38 PM -----

From:      
 "Webmaster(Matt
Ward)" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 Eclipse Management
Organization <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
Cc:      
 David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>, richard@xxxxxxxxxxx, Sharon
Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:      
 05/28/2014 03:03 PM
Subject:    
   Re: Committer
election under way that's not needed ....

---

I've deleted the election and votes just to stop any automated
mailing and updates to the tracking DB.

-Matt.

On 05/28/2014 02:37 PM, Eclipse Management Organization
wrote:
Just letting it run its course would be easiest for all
involved, I think. A PMC member should be able to to just veto when it
comes through. I don't think it will cause any downstream problems.

Webmaster, or Sharon... any other ideas?

We do need to make sure that the new implementation of committer elections
(when it's ready) takes this into consideration.

Thanks,

Wayne

On 05/27/2014 09:30 AM, David M Williams wrote:
Wayne, et., al., ... if there is an
easy way to "cancel" an election, without making it sound like
"unsuccessful" this would be the time. 

Jens Reimann was already a commiter in Orbit, and Chris "nominated
him" without knowing or looking first. 

If not easy to do ... guess we can let things "run their course"
... but hope that doesn't complicate something down the line? 

Thanks, 



----- Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 05/27/2014 09:27 AM
----- 

From:        Chris
Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jens
Reimann <jens.reimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cc:        Orbit
Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        05/26/2014
12:13 PM 
Subject:        Re:
[orbit-dev] Request to add Netty 4.0.19 
Sent by:        orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Ah you're right: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.orbit/who

Interesting that the portal didn't yell at me for electing a committer
that already was there. 


On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Jens Reimann <jens.reimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote: 
Correct.

But if I did not got kicked out, I should already be committer. ;-) 

On May 26, 2014 6:02 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> I missed this too, sorry.
>
> I'm going to assume you're volunteering to own these packages in Orbit
and kicked off the committer vote.
>
> Let us know how we can help you once you have access.
>
> 
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:58 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>
>> Jens,
>>
>> Did you ever get a response?
>>
>> I'd say "any time now".
>>
>> But, to remind you and everyone, I'd prefer not to "promote"
any more builds until after Luna releases, just to avoid confusion over
"which one to use for Luna".
>>
>> The builds will still take place, but only be available in "committers"
area, on build machine ... not on main "downloads" page.
>>
>> HTH, and thanks for your contributions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:        Jens Reimann <jens.reimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To:        orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
>> Date:        05/19/2014 05:04 AM
>> Subject:        [orbit-dev] Request to add
Netty 4.0.19
>> Sent by:        orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> ________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Orbit,
>>
>> I would like to add Netty 4.0.19 [1] to Eclipse Orbit. We will
be using
>> it in the Eclipse SCADA Project and have a piggy back CQ [2] to
the
>> original CQ [3].
>>
>> At the moment we only require a subset of Netty, so I would only
add the
>> following modules:
>> - io.netty.buffer
>> - io.netty.codec
>> - io.netty.common
>> - io.netty.handler
>> - io.netty.transport
>>
>> If anybody requires an additional module I would also add this
from the
>> beginning.
>>
>> These modules are not required for Luna! So if now is not a good
time,
>> just let me now when I can add them.
>>
>> A short description of netty (from their homepage):
>>
>>    Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables
quick and easy
>> development of network applications such as protocol servers and
>> clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming
such
>> as TCP and UDP socket server.
>>
>> It can be compared to Apache Mina (which already is in Orbit).
Although
>> one can argue a lot about whether to use Mina or Netty, I think
there
>> are good reasons for both.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jens
>>
>> [1] http://netty.io/
>> [2] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8292
>> [3] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8259
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> orbit-dev mailing list
>> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> orbit-dev mailing list
>> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>>
>
>
> 
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Aniszczyk
> http://aniszczyk.org
> +1
512 961 6719 



-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719 _______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev

-- 
Wayne Beaton on behalf of the Eclipse
Management Organization