[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [orbit-dev] Checking in bundles with modified manifest
|
Hi Gunnar,
Thanks for the quick response! Would it be ok from a legal point of view to leave in the optional dependency to Jettison? If yes, then of course we can simply check it in as is and everything is fine. I was just worried about having the "Jettison" entry in the Manifest.
Best regards, Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gunnar Wagenknecht
Sent: Mittwoch, 9. November 2011 10:28
To: Orbit Developer discussion
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Checking in bundles with modified manifest
Hi Robert,
Am 09.11.2011 10:22, schrieb Wetzold, Robert:
> Is it ok to modify the manifest in a way that we exclude the jettison
> dependency? We do this locally and it works fine. It is optional anyway.
I don't think that removing optional dependencies is a good idea. There
may be some clients out there that may use the library in combination
with such an optional dependency.
Why do you need to remove it? Is it because of p2? If yes, then there is
a way to force p2 to not install the optional dependency by putting in
some instructions into a p2.inf file. The p2 experts should know the
exact lines to put in.
-Gunnar
--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://wagenknecht.org/
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
