Hi, Joel,
Speaking for myself, I did not feel that I had sufficient understanding of what Derby is to provide meaningful commentary on your proposal regarding contribution of those libraries. It seemed that replying with "sorry, I don't have any comment" would just be noise. Moreover, Pascal seemed to know enough to make some helpful suggestions, so that really made such a response pointless.
I guess the rule-of-thumb is that absence of response is tacit approval. After all, we don't have a process for voting-in contributions. What we do have is a process for voting in committers (bundle maintainers, really) and IP approval of contributions. The former is initiated by a sponsor, such as ZX with whom you have already discussed participation. The latter is the "ATO" Contribution Questionnaire in the Portal, which is available once you have been voted in as a committer.
Cheers,
Christian On 2-Feb-09, at 2:43 PM, Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote: Hello,
Over the past six months I have initiated two threads with offers to contribute to Orbit, the first on 4 August and more recently on 31 January. Neither thread has led to a meaningful conversation. The first had no reply at all, while the second elicited a couple of technical questions from Pascal Rapicault to which I responded. There were no further replies.
I am left to wonder why. Certainly it is not because nobody has the time to monitor Orbit, as in the past several days there has been copious dialogue around participation. I can only assume that I have done something terribly wrong and offensive to this community. If so, at least tell me what it was so I have an opportunity to apologise and correct my ways.
Thanks, Joel P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ orbit-dev mailing list orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
-- Christian W. Damus Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc. Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
|