RE: [orbit-dev] Anybody want JSch-0.1.38?

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Scott,

I filed
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=232416
And
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2317
For upgrading to JSch-0.1.38

Let's bring this into Orbit regardless of whether the 
Platform will eventually decide to pick it oup or not.

Jeff can you please +1 the CQ as the Orbit PMC.

Scott if you have any concrete information about bugs
that are likely fixed by 0.1.38, it might help if you
mention these on the Bug. Also note that I uploaded
a preview Jar of JSch-0.1.38 that installs directly 
into the Eclipse Dropins folder, so you can try out
the new version easily to see whether your issue(s)
are fixed.

For DSDP-TM, we first thought that this bug were fixed
By upgrading to JSch-0.1.38 but it's not:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=230831


Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Lewis
> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008 20:54
> To: Orbit Developer discussion
> Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Anybody want JSch-0.1.38?
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> > <stuff deleted>
> >
> > For us in DSDP-TM, fixes (1) and (7) are interesting though not a 
> > "must have" for
> > Ganymede. Is anybody else interested such that I should go 
> and file an 
> > IPZilla
> > / Orbit request? Is it even realistic to get 0.1.38 in for Ganymede?
> 
> We (ECF) use jsch for scp-based file transfer, and so are 
> interested.  
> It looks like there are several bugs in .37 that were fixed 
> in .38..and 
> so we would ultimately like to use .38.  But I'm not sure 
> whether it's 
> too late or not for getting .38 into the Platform.  Also, I would 
> personally be worried about the potential for regression without some 
> opportunity for testing.
> 
> >
> > My personal take is that I'd like to go and try getting it 
> into Orbit, 
> > then we
> > can still decide whether the Platform's going to adopt it 
> out of Orbit 
> > or not.
> > Sounds reasonable?
> 
> +1.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>