RE: [orbit-dev] 20 Orbit CQs need attention

[DJ Houghton <DJ_Houghton@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Cool, I didn't get a chance to get to this yesterday. Jeff, thanks for
taking care of it.



orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/24/2008 07:22:12 PM:

> Actually I have done all of them except the following
> 208
> 1587
> 1709
> 1925
>
> STP, ECF and GMF have to do something about those
>
> Jeff
>
> From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jeff McAffer
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 6:54 PM
> To: 'Orbit Developer discussion'
> Subject: RE: [orbit-dev] 20 Orbit CQs need attention
>
> I have taken care of all the ones in the Eclipse project and will
> update the ip log shortly
> 237 - 2195
> 256 - 2196
> 305 - 2197
> 1569 - 2198
> 299 - 2206
> 243 - 2199
> 293 - 2200
> 1065 - 2201
> 1116 - 2202
> 1153 - 2203
> 1232 - 2204
> 1367 - 2205
>
> From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of David M Williams
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:20 AM
> To: Orbit Developer discussion
> Subject: [orbit-dev] 20 Orbit CQs need attention
>
>
> I'm updated the Orbit build pages with a bit more information. For
> example, see
> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/committers/drops/S20080324060456/

>
> In the most recent builds from Orbit, you'll notice a link that says
> IPZilla list of all CQs
> This is just a handy link to IPZilla querying CQ numbers that are
> listed in the Orbit Iplogs.
> If you click on and examine the list, you'll notice 20 that are
incorrect.
> That is, they are not Orbit CQs after all, but CQs for some other
project.
> All of our listed CQs should be orbit CQs, under the new rules (or,
> old rules newly interpreted).
>
> So .. if you are responsible for any of these bundles (see below)
> there two courses of action.
> 1) Update IPLog. It might be there really is an Orbit CQ already,
> but just hasn't been filled in the Orbit IP Log. If that's the case,
> just update the IPLog.
> 2) Get an Orbit CQ. This is easier these days. If you go to the Eclipse
Portal
> , under your Project sections,
> you'll see an "[add] an approved third-party library to Orbit" link,
> that pretty much does everything for you, and should be quickly
> approved, and then you can update the IPLog.
>
> ID
>
> Project
>
> Summary
>
> 296
>
> birt.ece
>
> Junit Version: 3.8.1
>
> 237
>
> eclipse.equinox
>
> Apache JaxMe 2 Version: 0.5.1
>
> 256
>
> eclipse.equinox
>
> Apache XML RPC Version: 3
>
> 305
>
> eclipse.equinox
>
> MX4J (JMX Engine Only) Version: 3.0.1
>
> 1569
>
> eclipse.equinox
>
> ws-commons-utility 1.0.1
>
> 299
>
> eclipse.jdt
>
> Junit Version: 3.8.2
>
> 243
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> Apache Lucene Version: 1.9.1
>
> 293
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> jsch Version: 0.1.28
>
> 1065
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> ICU4J (core and extended function) and ICU4J Replacement plug-in Version:
3.6
>
> 1116
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> ICU4J Version: 3.4.5.20061213
>
> 1153
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> JSch 0.1.31 Version: 0.1.31
>
> 1232
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> Apache Ant Version: 1.7.0
>
> 1367
>
> eclipse.platform
>
> ICU4J and ICU4J Replacement Version: 3.6.1
>
> 208
>
> modeling.gmf
>
> Apache Batik Version: 1.6
>
> 1587
>
> stp
>
> JDom Version: 1.0 (top level source code only)
>
> 1709
>
> stp
>
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1.jar Version: 2.0
>
> 1925
>
> technology.ecf
>
> jslp Version: 1.0.0.RC2 (**Future versions: see note in bug)
>
> 131
>
> tptp.monitoring
>
> Commons Codec Version: 1.3
>
> 1013
>
> tptp.monitoring
>
> org.apache.ant Version: 1.6.5
>
> 1014
>
> tptp.monitoring
>
> org.apache.lucene Version: 1.4.3
>
>  _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev