RE: [orbit-dev] Invitation: Orbit conference call (Jan 9 11:00 AM EST)

[Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

couple of notes. 

- OBR was just one idea.  The main
benefit is that it is repo agnostic so the current orbit download site
for example would serve just fine as a repo.  Similarly, an update
site or maven repo would alos work...

- Re putting "enabling features"
in Orbit.  It would be good to get a concrete list of such features
to see what the end picture would be.  Anyone got time to put this
together?  I suppose it would be good to have the list of all the
bundles to go in Orbit for Europa... 

- Sorry about the delay in the meeting
notice last time.  I just sent out an invite for 3 weeks from now
and created the wiki page.  Please add agenda items there.

Note also, we do not need to wait for
three weeks to talk about things.  Please bring up topics on the mailng
list as needed.

Jeff

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/10/2007 08:31 AM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Orbit Developer discussion" <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [orbit-dev] Invitation: Orbit conference call (Jan 9 11:00 AM EST)

Hi Folks,
 
sorry for not being able to join
the Orbit call yesterday. I definitely intended, and looking at the minutes
discussion was about exactly the topics of interest for me. Unfortunately
something urgent crept in so I missed the call. 
 
The OBR idea looks very good.
I think I do understand now the idea of how the build should ultimately
work, and we're in the process of migrating the TM builder to use the packager
so we can put Orbit stuff into the baseLocation.
 
Regarding the Features, I found
it good that Callisto had the "Enabling Features" category, and
in fact I occasionally go ONLY such features from the Callisto site (e.g.
I needed commons.logging but WITHOUT TPTP or WTP or any other provider).
I'd thus vote for keeping the "Enabling Features" in Europa.
So it's more a question of granularity. Do we want to have 1 feature per
bundle, or group them together.
Regarding the question who serves
(provides) the "Enabling" features, I think it's a good idea
to have them in Orbit -- I've always found it awkward to tear apart the
repositories for a bundle and the corresponding feature.
 
Hopefully cu next meeting. Jeff
can you send out the invitation early so I can definitely mark my calendar
this time?
 
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

---

From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff McAffer
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 11:27 PM
To: orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [orbit-dev] Invitation: Orbit conference call (Jan 9 11:00
AM EST)

	Calendar Entry

Subject

Orbit conference call

When

Date	01/09/2007
Time	11:00 AM - 12:00 PM (1 hour)

Chair

Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/IBM

Invitees
Required (to)	orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Optional (cc)

I don't see this in my calendar but the minutes of the last meeting call
for another Orbit conference call to be scheduled for Tues Jan 9 at 11EST.

http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=1&day=9&year=2007&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=188

613.287.8000 or 866.362.7064
passcode 874551# _______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev