Re: [nebula-dev] [VOTE NEEDED] Nebula Release

[Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tom,

I think time is a problem for most of us. However, if the API is mature and has been field tested as much as these then I am not worried to include them. In addition to the payment issue, which I think is a good model, we could also configure Gerrit to enable contributions from users.

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From an API and stability point of view

PGroup +1
Grid   +1
PShelf +1

My personal problem is that I don't have enough time to maintain them,
fix bugs and implement new features unless a customer shows up and pays
for them.

Tom

On 31.07.13 12:43, Wim Jongman wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> We have various requests for an official Nebula release. Do we still
> want to go ahead with this or do we want to stay a perpetual incubator?
> Please discuss.
>
> I am ready to go ahead with this but I need help. Please provide a +1
> and your widget name if you want to release your widget into the
> release. If you do not vote +1 then your widget is not included.
>
> The rules for releases are here [1]
>
> Regards,
>
> Wim
>
> [2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews#What_are_the_Requirements.3F
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>

_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev