| Hi all,
Great work on the build ! Sorry for not working with you last week.
I think the update site will be used to install the example application, start playing with widgets and developp applications, thus +1 for including the src on the update site.
On the other side, it should be possible to package an application with Nebula signed jars but without the sources. (maybe we can offer a binary-only download).
Le 29 nov. 2011 à 11:24, Mickael Istria a écrit :
Hi,
My experience with Nebula consumption in RCP apps is that I used
only a few widgets, so I never used features to consume Nebula in
the product in order to avoid installing useless stuff in it, I
always refer to bundles I want in a feature of mine.
So I am in favor of having sources and Javadoc part of the same
feature as the binaries. It is quite convenient at dev-time, and I
don't think it will be a problem for people to use Nebula in their
products.
Regards,
On 29/11/2011 09:39, Wim Jongman wrote:
Hi,
The update site is coming along nicely, Nicholas, Mickael and
I have been working on it for the past weeks and we have
published something on download:
The build of last night also includes all sources (not yet
published). Mickael and I are working on the incubation build
which will have a similar structure.
We would love to hear your comments. For example, do you
think we should offer the sources separate from the binaries?
Regards,
Wim
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
|
