[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [nebula-dev] NatTable EPP
|
Hi,
+1 for me on moving forward as a subproject to Nebula but Wim I'd like
to hear Wims and Nicolas' input.
Tom
Am 21.11.11 23:05, schrieb Edwin Park:
> Hi all,
>
> Once upon a time, there was a proposal to bring NatTable to Eclipse... :-)
>
> It has taken some time, but we've gotten through all the IP
> attribution issues finally and I have the go ahead from Eclipse legal
> to push this forward again. In the meantime I know Nebula has been
> going through changes as well. Importantly, in order to move forward
> this needs to be pushed by the Nebula folks. Tom, would you still be
> the one to do this or does that fall to Wim now?
>
> Also, I wanted to update everyone on the current status and sync up on
> the plan for moving forward to make sure we're all on the same page:
>
> The original New Widget request for NatTable is here:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=328836
> The latest version of the code attached to this is NatTable 2.2.0. The
> current production version is 2.3.0. No additional dependencies have
> been added in the interim, but there is new post-2.3.0 code in trunk
> that introduces a new dependency on Apache Poi for table export. This
> is packaged as a separate extension bundle however, so if there are
> issues with this we can always omit it from moving over to Eclipse.
>
> The NatTable Eclipse Project Proposal is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Krpj0ceaWqP-WndbR1Ba79gwhGCbUHNspw-j9naYPQc/edit?hl=en_US
> The only update that may need to be made for this is the tentative
> project schedule, which currently indicates code contribution and
> migration to Eclipse is Q4 2011..
>
> The plan for moving NatTable to Nebula was to make it a Nebula
> subproject rather than incorporating it into the conglomerate Nebula
> project and build. Tom and I favored this approach because we wanted
> to preserve the ability for NatTable to maintain its own independent
> release schedule. NatTable has 7 active committers and a history of
> putting out regular releases over the past four years. I'm happy to
> take on the additional maintenance overhead of treating NatTable as a
> separate project since that's what it is now anyway.
>
> Wayne needs confirmation from the Nebula project that we want to move
> forward with NatTable as a Nebula subproject, and then my
> understanding from legal is that we'd need someone from Nebula to kick
> off the CQ.
>
> It's been over a year since we started this journey and I'm eager to
> see this through. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Edwin
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
--
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833
http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834
