Re: [nebula-dev] Viewers

[Christopher J Gross <chris.gross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good.  The wrappers would
likely be rather easy.

-Chris

Tom Schindl <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: nebula-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

08/04/2006 11:59 AM

Please respond to
Nebula Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Nebula Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [nebula-dev] Viewers

Oh yeah. This was the bug I meant. I already have
a working version
appended to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149193 where
rows and cells are wrapped.

I think I'll discuss this with Tod and Boris in bug 149193 and how we
could proceed to make JFace provide the proxies.

At the moment my idea was to create an abstract wrapper class RowPart
and implementors need provide the implementation.

For projects JFace depends on namely SWT the Wrappers are provided by
JFace itself other implementors like nebula have to provide them their
own in the viewer project e.g. your NebFace.

Tom

Christopher J Gross schrieb:
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Maybe you meant this bug?
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151644
> 
> As you can see its been decided against.  It would be really
great if
> JFace could provide a widget wrapper/proxy mechanism.  I think
having
> each widget developer create their own viewer is kinda redundant
> redundant.  They would also almost certainly lag behind design
and
> feature changes in the main JFace viewers.  Does any of your
existing
> patches contain this kind of wrapper feature?
> 
> I do have plans to create a Nebula project with a JFace dependency
(how
> bout NebFace?).  Besides just viewers there could be other things
like
> contribution managers too.  
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *Tom Schindl <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: nebula-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 08/04/2006 10:30 AM
> Please respond to
> Nebula Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
>                  
> To
>                  Nebula
Dev <nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>                  
> Subject
>                  Re:
[nebula-dev] Viewers
> 
> 
>                  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Tom Schindl schrieb:
>> Just my 2¢.
>>
>> At the moment there's great effort at JFace-side to make Viewers
more
>> platform compatible and extensible.
>>
> 
> Sorry meant not platform but widget-set
> 
>> See
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149193
>>
>> and maybe more important for you nebula:
>>
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151377
> 
> If this does go through I already providing this at JFace level using
> wrappers which widget-implementators (e.g. nebula) have to provide.
> 
>>
>> A nebula-viewer-project although is in my idea a good thing to
have
>> because it could provide more specialized Viewers ontop of JFace.
>>
>> I think the same concept of than SWT vs. JFace could be done for
nebula
>> Nebula vs NeFace (NebulaJFace).
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Ian Bull schrieb:
>>> I agree with this this, I think having viewers for some of
these widgets
>>> will really help with adoption.
>>>
>>> Do you think the existing content provider interfaces will
work or will
>>> you need a more specialized ICTableTreeStructuredContenetProvider?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> ian
>>>
>>> Roland Tepp wrote:
>>>> Although I admit I don't quite know anything about the
internal
>>>> structure of Nebula project the first thing popping to
my mind is to
>>>> have two well separated CVS/eclipse projects - one for
widget(s) and
>>>> another for viewer code.
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy Dowdall kirjutas mulle  midagi seesugust:
>>>>> I will be uploading the CTableTree this weekend but
am not sure what to
>>>>> do with its viewer since, as mentioned on this list,
Nebula is not to
>>>>> have dependencies beyond SWT.  I have no problem
with keeping the
> viewer
>>>>> on my Sourceforge site and linking to it from CTableTree's
Nebula page
>>>>> (it's great advertising, how could I mind?!) but there
should probably
>>>>> be a more defined solution in the works - as also
mentioned, people
> will
>>>>> want viewers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts / comments?
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nebula-dev mailing list
>>>>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nebula-dev mailing list
>>>>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>>>>>    
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nebula-dev mailing list
>>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nebula-dev mailing list
>> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev


_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev