Re: [mylyn-reviews-dev] Bugzilla components

[alvaro sanchez <alvsan09@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello, 
On today's Mylyn meeting, Stephen explained how the word "connector" has been used in the past to mean a broader concept at the same time as separating the reference implementation from a framework.

So my vote is a +1 for the proposal.

/Alvaro

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kilian Matt <kilian.matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ok, maybe we should find another suffix than "connector", but I'm not
very happy with " based" either.

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:11 PM, alvaro sanchez <alvsan09@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Kilian,
> Would the components below go under:
> Classification: Mylyn
> Product: Mylyn Reviews
> components:
>>>  Framework
>>>  Gerrit
>>>  R4E
>>>  Tasks
>
> If this is the case, why would it cause a confusion ?
> the only concern is that adding the word "connector" seems to limit the
> scope of the components, shouldn't they be more like "Task Based" and
> "Gerrit Based", I guess we can come up with better names but just and
> example.
>
> Regards
> /Alvaro
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kilian Matt <kilian.matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alvaro,
>>
>> the problem with that was that there may already be components with
>> the same name, which could cause confusion if someone wants to file a
>> bug for the integration rather than the implementation. So in order to
>> be more concise the connector was added to the name to clarify that.
>>
>> kilian
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:28 PM, alvaro sanchez <alvsan09@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Before voting could you clarify if the scope for the Gerrit component
>> > and
>> > Task has changed ?
>> > i.e. adding the word "connector" may be a bit restrictive .. so are the
>> > components expected to be full review tool implementations or limited to
>> > the
>> > connector functionality?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > /Alvaro
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Steffen Pingel
>> > <steffen.pingel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> sorry to reopen this discussion but we recently changed the naming
>> >> scheme for Bugzilla components for the other Mylyn sub-projects to
>> >> avoid confusion. I was wondering if this would also make sense for the
>> >> Reviews project.
>> >>
>> >> So instead of Framework, Gerrit, SCM, Tasks, R4E we would end up with
>> >> the following components:
>> >>
>> >>  Framework
>> >>  Gerrit Connector
>> >>  R4E
>> >>  Tasks Connector
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure that we need an SCM component since SCM related bugs
>> >> should be tracked in the Mylyn Versions project or fall under the
>> >> Framework component.
>> >>
>> >> Can we hold a quick vote on this proposal?
>> >>
>> >> Steffen
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Steffen Pingel
>> >> Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
>> >> Senior Developer, http://tasktop.com
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
>> >> mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
>> > mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
>> mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
> mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev