mylyn-pmc http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/maillist.html mylyn-pmc en-us Wed, 23 May 2012 12:20:03 GMT Wed, 23 May 2012 12:20:03 GMT http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss MHonArc RSS 2.0 RCFile webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) webmaster@eclipse.org (Webmaster) mylyn-pmc http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse.org-common/themes/Phoenix/images/eclipse_home_header.jpg http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/maillist.html Re: [mylyn-pmc] Intent and MFT in Juno http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00119.html -- Steffen PingelSenior Software Developer, Eclipse MylynMylyn Tasks Leadhttp://tasktop.com
We intentionally separated the projects for the Juno release. The Mylyn sub-projects that are rolled up in the release have a large overlap in terms of committers and are distributed using a common build and repository. 

We haven't yet taken taken the time to setup an aggregation build to consume the new sub-sub projects and unfortunately haven't updated the website to properly reflect the top-level restructuring, yet. Once we have that in place and a few system tests for basic validation it would make sense to me to roll up everything on that common repository into a Juno+1 contribution.

One of the benefits of having separate contributions for Juno is that the new projects, Intent and MFT, get a little bit more visibility and count towards Juno's growth. I also think that it's good practice for incubating projects to go through the Eclipse release and release train process at least once. Aggregating all the necessary documentation and navigating the release process is a great way to learn the Eclipse way and reflect upon the principles of the EDP.

I think we discussed this earlier this year on a Mylyn call and at EclipseCon. I'll try to do a better job in the future to communicate important decisions of this kind on the pmc and dev lists.

Steffen




On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just noticed that most of Mylyn is doing a "roll up" release with Juno, with the exception of Intent and Model Focusing Tools.

Is this an oversight? i.e. should Intent and MFT be included in the roll up or are they separate by design?

I'm guessing that this is the result of the painfully deficient tools we have for capturing this information...

Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

_______________________________________________
mylyn-pmc mailing list
mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc




--
Steffen Pingel
Senior Software Developer, Eclipse Mylyn
Mylyn Tasks Lead
http://tasktop.com

]]> Wed, 23 May 2012 12:18:25 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00119.html steffen.pingel@xxxxxxx (Steffen Pingel) [mylyn-pmc] [CQ 6507] Google Gson Version: 2.1 (ATO CQ5923) (using Orbit CQ6117) http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00118.html http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6507 Genie Eclipse &lt;genie@xxxxxxxxxxx&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #1 from Genie Eclipse t;... http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6507 Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #1 from Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-16 15:30:09 --- This CQ is currently awaiting PMC Approval. PMC members, please use the PMC_Approved flag on this CQ to indicate your approval (flag set to "+") or disapproval (flag set to "-"). -- Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the CQ. ]]> Wed, 16 May 2012 19:30:10 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00118.html emo-ip-team@xxxxxxx (emo-ip-team) [mylyn-pmc] [CQ 6506] Google Gson Version: 2.1 (ATO CQ5923) (using Orbit CQ6117) http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00117.html http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6506 Genie Eclipse &lt;genie@xxxxxxxxxxx&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #1 from Genie Eclipse t;... http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6506 Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #1 from Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-16 15:30:03 --- This CQ is currently awaiting PMC Approval. PMC members, please use the PMC_Approved flag on this CQ to indicate your approval (flag set to "+") or disapproval (flag set to "-"). -- Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the CQ. ]]> Wed, 16 May 2012 19:30:08 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00117.html emo-ip-team@xxxxxxx (emo-ip-team) [mylyn-pmc] [CQ 6505] Google Gson Version: 2.1 (ATO CQ5923) (using Orbit CQ6117) http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00116.html http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6505 Genie Eclipse &lt;genie@xxxxxxxxxxx&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #1 from Genie Eclipse t;... http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6505 Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|new |awaiting_pmc --- Comment #1 from Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-16 15:30:01 --- This CQ is currently awaiting PMC Approval. PMC members, please use the PMC_Approved flag on this CQ to indicate your approval (flag set to "+") or disapproval (flag set to "-"). -- Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the CQ. ]]> Wed, 16 May 2012 19:30:03 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00116.html emo-ip-team@xxxxxxx (emo-ip-team) Re: [mylyn-pmc] PMC approval needed - R4E 0.10 Release Review http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00115.html &#xA0; From: mylyn-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mylyn-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alvaro Sanchez Sent: May-15-12 10:01 AMTo: mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [mylyn-pmc] PMC approval needed - R4E 0.10 Release Review &#xA0;Mylyn PMC members,;&#xA0;I have reques...

+1 congrats

 

From: mylyn-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mylyn-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alvaro Sanchez
Sent: May-15-12 10:01 AM
To: mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [mylyn-pmc] PMC approval needed - R4E 0.10 Release Review

 

Mylyn PMC members, 

 

I have requested a release review for Review for Eclipse 0.10 (see [1]), 

The IP log has been approved, and the release review end date has been set to May 23rd.

 

The documentation is available in [2].

 

I would like to freeze the documentation in [2] as final only after I have received your approval.

 

Regards

/Alvaro

 

 

[1] 379287: [release] mylyn.reviews.r4e 0.10

 

 

[2] 378518: Need to prepare slides for the 0.10.0 release review

]]> Wed, 16 May 2012 00:51:02 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00115.html mik@xxxxxxx (Mik Kersten) Re: [mylyn-pmc] PMC approval needed - R4E 0.10 Release Review http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00114.html +1 Great to hear! Steffen On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Alvaro Sanchez <alvsan09@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mylyn PMC members, > > I have requested a release review for Review for Eclipse 0.10 (see [1]), > The IP log has been approved, and the release review end date has been set > to May 23rd. > > The documentation is available in [2]. > > I would like to freeze the documentation in [2] as final only after I have > received your approval. > > Regards > /Alvaro > > > [1] 379287: [release] mylyn.reviews.r4e 0.10 > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=379287 > > > [2] 378518: Need to prepare slides for the 0.10.0 release review > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378518 > > _______________________________________________ > mylyn-pmc mailing list > mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc > -- Steffen Pingel Senior Software Developer, Eclipse Mylyn Mylyn Tasks Lead http://tasktop.com ]]> Tue, 15 May 2012 19:48:17 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00114.html steffen.pingel@xxxxxxx (Steffen Pingel) Re: [mylyn-pmc] PMC approval needed - R4E 0.10 Release Review http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00113.html ______________________________Miles T. ParkerSenior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktophttp://tasktop.comCommitter, Eclipse Mylyn and VirgoProject Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMPhttp://milesparker.blogspot.comskype: milestravisparker

+1

Looks good to me, FWIW -- but I'm still not entirely familiar with Mylyn process. (Only concern is status of UI reviews and don't think that should be barrier given low number of release.)

On 2012-05-15, at 10:00 AM, Alvaro Sanchez wrote:

Mylyn PMC members, 

I have requested a release review for Review for Eclipse 0.10 (see [1]), 
The IP log has been approved, and the release review end date has been set to May 23rd.

The documentation is available in [2].

I would like to freeze the documentation in [2] as final only after I have received your approval.

Regards
/Alvaro


[1] 379287: [release] mylyn.reviews.r4e 0.10


[2] 378518: Need to prepare slides for the 0.10.0 release review
_______________________________________________
mylyn-pmc mailing list
mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc

______________________________
Miles T. Parker
Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop
Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo
Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP
skype: milestravisparker



]]> Tue, 15 May 2012 17:15:30 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00113.html miles.parker@xxxxxxx (Miles Parker) [mylyn-pmc] PMC approval needed - R4E 0.10 Release Review http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00112.html Mylyn PMC members,&#xA0;I have requested a release review for Review for Eclipse 0.10 (see [1]),&#xA0;The IP log has been approved, and the release review end date has been set to May 23rd. The documentation is available in [2].I would like to freeze the documentati...
I have requested a release review for Review for Eclipse 0.10 (see [1]), 
The IP log has been approved, and the release review end date has been set to May 23rd.

The documentation is available in [2].

I would like to freeze the documentation in [2] as final only after I have received your approval.

Regards
/Alvaro


[1] 379287: [release] mylyn.reviews.r4e 0.10


[2] 378518: Need to prepare slides for the 0.10.0 release review
]]> Tue, 15 May 2012 17:00:44 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00112.html alvsan09@xxxxxxx (Alvaro Sanchez) Re: [mylyn-pmc] Intent and MFT in Juno http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00111.html ______________________________Miles T. ParkerSenior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktophttp://tasktop.comCommitter, Eclipse Mylyn and VirgoProject Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMPhttp://milesparker.blogspot.comskype: milestravisparker

Hi Wayne,

Thanks for checking into this. This is intentional for MFT, I can't speak to the intention of Intent. :) Even though it is functionally parallel to "built-in" Mylyn Context consumers, MFT really is a different beast. In addition to the +3 Mylyn dependencies, we have +3 on Modelling tools as well. While we have an excellent set of contributors and the technology is quite solid, it really isn't up to the level of maturity that I think Mylyn users would expect, especially in terms of consumption by downstream users. Given that we didn't want to create unneeded risks and confusion for the rest of the Mylyn release.

hth,

Miles

On 2012-05-14, at 12:43 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:

I just noticed that most of Mylyn is doing a "roll up" release with Juno, with the exception of Intent and Model Focusing Tools.

Is this an oversight? i.e. should Intent and MFT be included in the roll up or are they separate by design?

I'm guessing that this is the result of the painfully deficient tools we have for capturing this information...

Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects
_______________________________________________
mylyn-pmc mailing list
mylyn-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-pmc

______________________________
Miles T. Parker
Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop
Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo
Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP
skype: milestravisparker



]]> Mon, 14 May 2012 19:59:37 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00111.html miles.parker@xxxxxxx (Miles Parker) [mylyn-pmc] Intent and MFT in Juno http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00110.html I just noticed that most of Mylyn is doing a "roll up" release with Juno, with the exception of Intent and Model Focusing Tools. Is this an oversight? i.e. should Intent and MFT be included in the roll up or are they separate by design? I'm guessing that ... I just noticed that most of Mylyn is doing a "roll up" release with Juno, with the exception of Intent and Model Focusing Tools.

Is this an oversight? i.e. should Intent and MFT be included in the roll up or are they separate by design?

I'm guessing that this is the result of the painfully deficient tools we have for capturing this information...

Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects
]]> Mon, 14 May 2012 19:43:49 GMT http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-pmc/msg00110.html wayne@xxxxxxx (Wayne Beaton)