Sebastien,
Don't worry, no offense taken. :-)
Cheers,
Ed
On 26.09.2017 09:54, GERARD Sebastien
wrote:
Hi Ed,
I guess that on your turn you misinterpreted my email that
was a real question (may be naiv) and for sure not a bad
critic.
Best.
Sebastien.
Envoyé
depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy.
-------- Message d'origine --------
Date : 26/09/2017 09:21 (GMT+01:00)
Objet : Re: [modeling-pmc] UML2 and Photon
Sebastien
I think you are misinterpreting "require UML2's extended
GenModel to take action" as synonymous with "the changes are
bad."
Any change (good or bad) to the GenModel.ecore affects (at
least potentially) UML's extended GenModel implementation.
http://git.eclipse.org/c/emf/org.eclipse.emf.git/log/plugins/org.eclipse.emf.codegen.ecore/model/GenModel.ecore
Also any change to templates (good or bad) affects (at least
potentially) UML's specialized templates:
http://git.eclipse.org/c/emf/org.eclipse.emf.git/log/plugins/org.eclipse.emf.codegen.ecore/templates/model/Class.javajet
We can all be thankful (and I
certainly am!) that Itemis consistently sponsors my
contributions and that Dennis Hübner of TypeFox does the
Releng work on my behalf.
Note that lack of signing support for Buckminster builds will
become a significant problem for someone, or perhaps everyone,
when the foundation disables that service.
Regards,
Ed
On 26.09.2017 08:03, GERARD Sebastien wrote:
Hi Ed,
Can you tell me what are the changes that have been made
and will be bad for photon w.r.t. EMF generator part?
Thanks.
Best.
Seb.
Envoyé
depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy.
-------- Message d'origine --------
Date : 25/09/2017 18:11 (GMT+01:00)
Objet : Re: [modeling-pmc] UML2 and Photon
Kenn,
That's pretty bad for Papyrus, parts of OCL, and parts of
EMF Compare. :-( And I'm not sure which other
release-train parts are downstream of those parts...
Downstream consumers should note that parts of UML2
(i.e., the generator parts) don't work with the latest EMF
(i.e., the generator parts of it) because any changes I
make to the GenModel (and I made many changes recently)
require UML2's extended GenModel to take action. So we
can't just feed the Oxygen version of UML2 into the Photon
train (at least not all of UML2's parts).
Regards,
Ed
On 25.09.2017 16:54, Kenn
Hussey wrote:
PMC,
I just wanted to give you a heads up that there are
currently no plans for UML2 to participate in the
upcoming Photon simultaneous release, due to lack of
funding. Unfortunately, this means that dependencies
will break when the aggregation file is disabled by
the EMO immediately following M4.
If anyone is interested (or knows someone who might
be interested) in helping ensure that UML2 is kept up
to date and that it can participate in the Photon
release, please reach out to me directly.
Thanks,
Kenn
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
|