Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] Project website migration to Git

Hello Wayne,

About EMF Facet, please, do what is the best for the community. But, please, add an HTTP redirect (301) as recommended by Google : http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=93633

Regards,
Grégoire
----- Mail Original -----
De: "Wayne Beaton" <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
À: modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Décembre 2012 17h35:20 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [modeling-pmc] Project website migration to Git


Earlier today, I made a recommendation that the EMF Refactor project move their website from /modeling/emft/refactor to /emf-refactor (with a redirect from the old URL to the new one). 

There are a handful of projects under EMFT that are actually owned by their project's UNIX group (the others are owned by the top-level project's UNIX group). I don't know if any of these projects need to be located where they are for technical reasons. I assume that--by virtue of being owned by their respective project's groups--they should be relatively easy to move. 

These projects are all candidates to just move to a flat stucture: 

drwxrwsr-x+ 8 emerks modeling.emft.b3 4096 2010-10-18 09:39 b3 
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 wkeil modeling.emft.doc2model 4096 2010-03-15 13:53 doc2model 
drwxrwsr-x+ 6 glefur modeling.emf.eef 4096 2010-01-13 05:39 eef 
drwxrwsr-x+ 6 lgoubet modeling.emf.egf 4096 2010-03-11 16:18 egf 
drwxrwsr-x+ 9 gdupe modeling.emft.emf-facet 4096 2011-04-22 07:28 facet 
drwxrwsr-x+ 8 ckrause modeling.emft.henshin 4096 2012-11-06 16:26 henshin 
drwxrwsr-x+ 5 tarendt modeling.emft.refactor 4096 2012-07-13 06:30 refactor 
. 

Since we're looking at a disruption anyway, does it make sense to migrate these directories to the root now? This will reduce the contents of the top-level directory which should make eventual further refactoring easier. 

Thoughts? 

Wayne 

On 12/12/2012 12:44 PM, Ed Willink wrote: 

Hi Wayne 

Yes. 

But emft should be treated as a container project (e.g.tmf), not a support folder (e.g. build). 

m2m has already migrated to mmt, so: 
- m2m could be discarded 
- m2m could be kept as the modeling/m2m sub-folder 
- m2m could be migrated as a live m2m container project (clashing with machine-to-machine) 
your/Ed Merks' choice. I favour keeping it as modeling/m2m so that it appears in GIT but doesn't 
have a new clashing repo that is stale before it's even created. 

Regards 

Ed Willink 

On 12/12/2012 15:42, Wayne Beaton wrote: 

As Ed stated, /modeling/amalgam and /modeling/mdt have been migrated in place (i.e. /gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/amalgam.git and /gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt.git). 

/modeling/gmt has been migrated to /gitroot/www.eclipse.org/gmt.git. We can ask webmaster to set up a redirect from /modeling/gmt to /gmt. 

Each of these subdirectories is owned by a particular modeling subproject. Each of these should be migrated to /gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/*.git (e.g. /gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf.git) with the same group ownership. 

drwxrwsr-x+ 24 nickb modeling.emf.emf 4096 2012-05-29 09:37 emf 
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 ahunter modeling.gmp 4096 2010-05-21 10:12 gmf 
drwxrwsr-x+ 20 8301 modeling.gmp 4096 2011-01-27 11:37 gmp 
drwxrwsr-x+ 11 nickb modeling.mmt 4096 2010-11-09 08:34 m2m 
drwxrwsr-x+ 19 nickb modeling.m2t 4096 2012-01-31 04:35 m2t 
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 ewillink modeling.mmt 4096 2012-05-14 16:17 mmt 
drwxrwsr-x+ 12 sefftinge modeling.tmf 4096 2011-03-10 05:57 tmf 

This is left over from a previous termination and can just be removed 

drwxrwsr-x+ 4 mward root 4096 2012-03-26 16:20 mddi 

I don't know what this is, but I think it needs to just go. 
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 nickb modeling 4096 2008-04-26 03:34 yeportal 

Which leaves all of these directories. These are all currently owned by the Modeling top-level project so I believe that they should all just be migrated to /gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling.git after pruning out all of the above 

drwxrwsr-x+ 3 nickb modeling 4096 2011-01-26 15:25 build 
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mtaal modeling 3457 2009-03-31 17:05 download.php,v 
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 nickb modeling 4096 2009-09-28 16:41 downloads 
drwxrwsr-x+ 31 nickb modeling 4096 2012-11-23 15:45 emft 
drwxrwsr-x+ 4 8301 modeling 4096 2009-01-02 00:17 images 
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 emerks modeling 4096 2012-11-13 07:30 includes 
-r--rwxr--+ 1 cbrun modeling 54569 2012-03-09 11:38 index.php,v 
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mtaal modeling 16257 2009-03-31 17:05 modeling-charter.php,v 
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 8301 modeling 4096 2007-10-14 08:13 presentations 
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mtaal modeling 731 2009-03-31 17:05 searchcvs.php,v 
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 nickb modeling 4096 2008-01-04 15:24 team 
drwxrwsr-x+ 5 emerks modeling 4096 2010-06-02 14:49 updates 
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mward root 9043 2011-01-26 15:18 _projectCommon.php,v 
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 mward root 4096 2008-11-14 09:05 project-info 

Does this make sense? 

Wayne 

On 12/12/2012 02:32 AM, Ed Merks wrote: 

Ed, 

I'm discussing with Wayne what needs to happen to end up with a reasonable/worksable non-CVS interim result from which we can migrate to a more sensible final structure. 

Regards, 
Ed 



On 10/12/2012 8:17 AM, Ed Willink wrote: 



Hi 

Ping. What is happening on this? 

[For MMT it transpired that a partial flattening had been exploited so that while MMT was not nested in modeling, it still depends on the root modeling scripts.] 

Regards 

Ed Willink 


On 04/12/2012 17:03, Ed Willink wrote: 


Hi 

What is happening about this? 

So far we have only two container project GITs. 

www.eclipse.org/modeling/amalgam.git 
www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt.git serving BPMN2, Modisco, OCL, Papyrus, UML2 and others 

For MDT to work after CVS shutdown, we need a www.eclipse.org/modeling.git trimmed to at least the root and common folders such as build, downloads, images, includes, project-info ... probably every folder that isn't for a 'container' project. 

I'll request a www.eclipse.org/modeling/mmt.git in accordance with Kenn's preference that container projects take GIT responsibility for their sub-projects. 

Regards 

Ed Willink 


On 01/12/2012 15:27, Kenn Hussey wrote: 


Given that a git repository has already been set up for MDT web content, my preference would be the latter. 


Kenn 


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Ed Willink < ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: 



I suggest that the modeling project as a whole should request either a single GIT repo for www/modeling/..., or give detailed instructions on how www/modeling in CVS should be parceled up into non-overlapping per project GIT repo's. 



_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc 



No virus found in this message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2634/5928 - Release Date: 11/30/12 



_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc 
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc 

-- 
Wayne Beaton 
The Eclipse Foundation 
Twitter: @waynebeaton 
Explore Eclipse Projects 
EclipseCon 2013

_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc 



No virus found in this message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2634/5951 - Release Date: 12/11/12 
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc 

-- 
Wayne Beaton 
The Eclipse Foundation 
Twitter: @waynebeaton 
Explore Eclipse Projects 
EclipseCon           2013
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

Back to the top