Re: [modeling-pmc] Committer vote for Dennis Huebner has concluded unsuc

[Wayne Beaton <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

There is no "website" project under modeling. There is, however, a "modeling.emf.website" UNIX group. There seems to be a mix of groups in the Modeling project's web directories. Some owned by "modeling.emf.website" and some by "modeling". I believe that webmaster needs to work some magic to make sure that people get put into the "website" group.

This election is concerned on the Modeling top-level project; as PL for that project, you should be able to retire those committers.

I'd like to spend some time trying to figure out how we can make this better. I'm confused, for example, that the /modeling/emf/cdo directory isn't owned by the modeling.emf.cdo UNIX group. Also, it seems that more and more modeling projects are opting to use the "flat" directory structure that we adopted some number of years ago (e.g. /Xtext), or use the data-driven pages as their website, which I believe reduces the need for a "website" group (i.e. each project maintains their own website).

I'm thinking... is there some change we can make in the new project management infrastructure that will help get modeling project committers out of the business of maintaining website metadata in CVS/Git?

Wayne

On 06/30/2012 03:31 AM, Ed Merks wrote:

Hi,

I'm a little frustrated with this issue of permissions for the website "project".  It seems the project isn't even listed in the portal, so I can't use the portal to decommitterize inactive committers.  In this case I'd like to remove Nick and Anthony from the committer list because we can't have successful timely elections without their participation.  If the website is to be treated as a project requiring elections then it should be treated as a project in the portal, right?

Regards,
Ed


On 30/06/2012 6:01 AM, portal on behalf of Ed Merks wrote:

modeling Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of the committer
vote for Dennis Huebner. Unfortunately, the vote did not gather enough +1s
in the voting period, thus the vote was not successful.

Vote summary: 1/0/0 with 2 not voting
    ?  Nick Boldt
    ?  Anthony Hunter
   +1  Ed Merks

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects