Re: [modeling-pmc] Epsilon's graduation from incubation

[Miles Parker <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1

On 2012-04-18, at 11:48 PM, Dimitris Kolovos wrote:

> Dear Modelling PMC,
> 
> As briefly discussed with Kenn and Ed, EMF is probably not the natural place for Epsilon to move to, and splitting Epsilon across MMT/M2T (Epsilon contains both M2M, M2T and other languages for tasks such as validation, pattern matching, migration, refactoring etc.) does not sound great either.
> 
> A sensible way forward could be for Epsilon to graduate as a sub-project directly under Eclipse Modelling. Would the PMC be OK with this?
> 
> Best regards,
> Dimitris
> 
> On 13 Apr 2012, at 23:32, Kenn Hussey wrote:
> 
>> Dimitris,
>> 
>> Thanks, the slides look good. I guess this mean moving Epsilon to the "emf" (as opposed to the "emft") namespace?
>> 
>> +1 from me for the graduation.
>> 
>> Kenn
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Dimitris Kolovos <dskolovos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear Modelling PMC,
>> 
>> After almost 6 years in incubation, we feel that time has come for Epsilon to graduate, and in order to schedule a combined graduation/release (1.0) review, the PMC's approval is needed. In preparation for this, we've put together a draft deck of slides according to [1]. Any feedback would be much appreciated.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Dimitris
>> 
>> [1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Criteria_for_Graduating_from_Incubation_Phase_to_Mature_Phase
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc