Let's leave Frederic as a co-lead for the time being and approve Ed
WIllink as a co-lead so we can active leadership in Frederic's
On 13/04/2012 4:20 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
If we can consider Ed's March 27 note  as the start of a
project lead election--which includes an implicit +1 from Ed--and
combine it with the two +1s recevied on April 13, then I feel that
we can declare this a valid election with a successful outcome.
With the PMC's approval, I will make Ed Willink a co-lead on the
In order to remove Frederic as co-lead, I'll need a unanimous
consent from the PMC.
On 04/13/2012 05:04 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Two weeks have now elapsed without any comment by any other M2M
I suggest that the PMC or EMO should decide on a course of
action to establish (co-)leadership for M2M ... MMT.
On 28/03/2012 01:45, ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In October 2011 prior to EclipseCon Europe there was
discussion on the M2M
dev list of a name change for M2M. Subsequent to EclipseCon
consensus on MMT (Model to Model Transformation) appeared in a
No action has occurred, since we have no active M2M lead to
We now have a requirement to migrate the website to GIT and
need an active
component lead to do or organise this.
I feel that the time has now come to thank Frederic for his
leadership and appoint a new component lead.
As the strongest M2M project, user-wise and committer-wise, I
ATL should probably provide the leadership, but after talking
Brun, it would appear that Obeo do not wish to take up this
QVTo is a strong project user-wise, but lacks active
I am the project lead and sole 'active' committer for the QVTd
(The QVTd activity is not very apparent in EGIT since the bulk
of my work
has been in developing auto-tooling for OCL that can be
re-used for QVT. I
have big plans for both QVTd and QVTo.) It seems to fall to me
to offer to
take on the role of MMT component lead.
I welcome hearing other people's views as to how MMT should
The Eclipse Foundation
modeling-pmc mailing list