Hello again
Frederic:
Radak and William
have kindly submitted
their IP logs for the Helios Review. Unfortunately, we did not hear
back
from you regarding where to move the current CQs filed against M2M
generally.
All CQs must be moved from the sub project level to a component level.
As
indicated previously this is a gate to the review of the IP Logs for
atl and
qvt.oml now.
There are not
very many CQs. You may
very well be able to identify where to move the CQs based on who
entered them.
We really need to do this work before the IP logs can be reviewed.
I hope to hear from you very soon.
Regards,
Sharon
Hi Frederic:
I’ve reviewed the CQs for Modeling M2M and
they all appear to be
aligned at the sub project level with the exception of one. CQs must
now
be aligned at the component level. This needs to be adjusted prior to
submitting the project’s IP Log for Helios.
As you can imagine, it will be unproductive
to try and deal with this
at IP log submission time. Therefore, we want to help the projects get
this task completed before logs are to be submitted. As such, I’m
attaching a spreadsheet for you of all M2M CQs. If you can simply
indicate where the CQs should be moved to, I’ll go ahead and make the
necessary changes for you. If there is an overlap in a CQ and more
than
one project requires it, a “reuse/piggyback” CQ will need to
entered for the overlap.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Sharon
Sharon Corbett
Intellectual Property Analyst
Eclipse Foundation Inc.
Tel: 613-224-9461 ext. 232
