Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] Graphiti Provisioning
1) Buckminster does support git, AFAIK, but the state of the git tooling (EGit and JGit) is still wanting (compared to support for CVS and SVN), and likely will be until the Helios release. As a new project, this may not be a great concern (depending on how soon you plan to submit your initial contribution), but for existing projects, it's not likely feasible to transition until after the release...

2) The project metadata also has to be set up or updated for the projects (in the portal).
 
Kenn

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Mike,

1) I have zero Git experience so do not know what issues there would be. I agree to look at Git, since it looks like that is the way Eclipse is going. I suppose CVS would be the safer option for now. Also start with Buckminster, EMF is almost moved.

2) Yes, one module for Graphiti, In terms of CVS, we currently have:
/cvsroot/modeling/org.eclipse.gmf
After the GMF restructure, it will become
/cvsroot/modeling/org.eclipse.gmp/org.eclipse.gmf.tooling
/cvsroot/modeling/org.eclipse.gmp/org.eclipse.gmf.runtime
/cvsroot/modeling/org.eclipse.gmp/org.eclipse.gmf.notation
So Graphiti would be
/cvsroot/modeling/org.eclipse.gmp/org.eclipse.graphiti

3) Now that both GMP and Graphiti are approved I will raise more Bugzillas for the webmasters.
We have:
Bugzilla
Mailing lists (gmf-dev becomes gmp-dev)
Newsgroup (org.eclipse.gmf becomes org.eclipse.gmp)
Website (modeling/gmf/gmf gets fixed)
There is likely more.

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613


Inactive hide details for "Wenz, Michael" ---2010/04/29 09:44:18 AM---Hi all,"Wenz, Michael" ---2010/04/29 09:44:18 AM---Hi all,


From:
"Wenz, Michael" <michael.wenz@xxxxxxx>

To:
"modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
2010/04/29 09:44 AM

Subject:
[modeling-pmc] Graphiti Provisioning



Hi all,

I’m collecting the stuff needed for the NPPR form for the Graphiti project and have a few questions regarding that:
      1) We would like to go for Git as source repository. Do you see any issues with that (besides the issues that will arise because it is still quite early to use it…)? Especially interesting would be anything in the area of the EMP/GMP infrastructure that will not work with that setup? What about the build infrastructure (I saw in the PMC Meeting agenda that EMP is going for Buckminster as common build system)?
      2) How is/will the CVS/SVN/Git modules to sub-project allocation handled within EMP and GMP? I would go for one module for Graphiti if that is ok for you. I talked to Bernd about that and he assumed that it should be something like GMP/Graphiti in parallel to GMP/GMF. Is that already defined? What would be the prefix for the modeling project: org.eclipse.emp ?
      3) Is there anything else besides the modules stuff I need to take care about in order to Graphiti being part of the new GMP project?

Many thanks,
Michael
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc



_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc


GIF image

GIF image

Back to the top