Re: [modeling-pmc] UMLX migration from GMT/UMLX to M2M/QVTd

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Eds.

Yes, a move review is required. Move reviews are relatively easy. All 
you need to do is provide a document that describes what needs to move 
from where to where. Be as specific as possible. In the process, the 
UMLX project/component also needs to be archived, so that will need to 
be indicated as well. So, the review document itself shouldn't be more 
than a couple of paragraphs (I've accepted a bug report for move review 
documentation). You'll also need (as Ed suggests) to have the IP Log for 
all moving code reviewed prior to the move.

HTH,

Wayne

Ed Merks wrote:
> Ed,
>
> That all sounds good. I believe moving this code requires an official 
> Move Review.  Any associated IP logs definitely need to be migrated so 
> Sharon will need to track that.
>
> Cheers,
> Ed
>
>
> Ed Willink wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > With GMT closing, it seems appropriate to migrate UMLX (a research 
> > activity into graphical QVT-like declarative transformations) to the 
> > QVT Declarative project.
> >
> > Since I am the sole GMT/UMLX committer (although not officially the 
> > lead) and the M2M/QVTd lead, this presumably poses no significant 
> > problems.
> >
> > The GMT/UMLX code underwent IP review when moving from GMT to 
> > Modeling/GMT.
> >
> > Any comments/approvals?
> >
> >     Regards
> >
> >         Ed Willink
> > _______________________________________________
> > modeling-pmc mailing list
> > modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org

I'm going to EclipseCon!
http://www.eclipsecon.org