Hi Dave, Ed, Sven et al
Dave Steinberg wrote:
Just to add one more thought to the questions about the scope of
this proposal and whether it should best be included in an existing
component...
Is it possible for a non-incubating MDT component, like OCL, to depend
on an incubating EMFT component? I would think not.
Christian and I discussed precisely these concerns in
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mdt.dev/msg00311.html
which was copied to PMC but got no response.
I requested comment again in
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/modeling-pmc/msg01031.html but got
no response.
My (perhaps wishful) recollection from I think a more general
discussion was that the "with incubation" branding could allow the main
MDT-OCL features to be unaffected, but for an additional incubation
example feature to have incubation dependencies. I don't seem to
be able to find the thread where I mooted the unattractive prospect of
having to start two new projects; one for an editor and one for a
registry.
This dilemma is perhaps the best technical/bureaucratic reason for
abandoning this proposal. If the proposed contribution is contained
completely
within a mature project, it can completely bypass the incubation phase!
It seems clear that this proposal is not wanted and that I am wasting
my and everyone else's time by trying to do what I perceive
to be the 'right' thing; making a useful project-independent
functionality project-independent.
I could reply to Ed and Sven's comments but since we clearly start with
very different perspectives, too much time and energy would
be wasted in resolving or not resolving some fundamental
misunderstandings.
Proposal withdrawn.
Regards
Ed Willink
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
|