Re: [SPAM] Re: [modeling-pmc] Fw: Is M2M/Operational QVT incubating?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [SPAM] Re: [modeling-pmc] Fw: Is M2M/Operational QVT incubating?

From: Frédéric Jouault <frederic.jouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:01:49 +0100
Delivered-to: modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PuK3HCYPAjCb5adznw+AQqT873q+opoB1GO5lFI4uTQm17xrSMBU1Yb4vGmxMbeBTf 2jOVfsG9vYq1o2wXskfF5Fy4m1DUd3Gh4Z/v1I/QNZkmBRHk6QnbLED4Rx/Ee2wh5qg6 3O/mDErN7Dz64TlyYCQH6tjv2XCaSeMwzsFV8=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/modeling-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:modeling-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc>, <mailto:modeling-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc>, <mailto:modeling-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Ed, Rich,

Thanks for your insight on this issue.


> I agree, it seems pointless at this stage.  Let's just wait for the
> processes to catch up.   In any case, if a plugin/feature has a version >=
> 1.0 then it's not incubating and as long as its release is/will be reviewed,
> then it's graduated...

I agree.


Thanks,

Frédéric

References:
- Re: [modeling-pmc] Fw: Is M2M/Operational QVT incubating?
  - From: Richard Gronback
- Re: [modeling-pmc] Fw: Is M2M/Operational QVT incubating?
  - From: Ed Merks

Prev by Date: Re: [modeling-pmc] Fw: Is M2M/Operational QVT incubating?
Next by Date: [modeling-pmc] [CQ 2992] Commons Logging Version: 1.0.4 (PB CQ133)
Previous by thread: Re: [modeling-pmc] Fw: Is M2M/Operational QVT incubating?
Next by thread: [modeling-pmc] [CQ 2992] Commons Logging Version: 1.0.4 (PB CQ133)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs