That’s right, thanks Paul.
I sent out a note to cross-project and I
thought this list stating that I’ll enter the reference within galileo.build
myself in order to prevent excessive breakage (not that that has worked all
that well either).
For the rest, just let me know when your
build model is ready for inclusion.
If you’re interested in seeing what’s
currently included in Galileo, look here: http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo
Best,
Rich
From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul Elder
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009
9:33 AM
To: PMC members mailing list
Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc]
Galileo build status
Rich, and fellow Galileo build non-contributors:
With
respect to JET, yes, I will continue updating the Galileo contribution.
As
for the others, my guess is that some misunderstanding on what is required to
be included in the Galileo build model. I clearly screwed something up :-)
Information
(which I just re-read) is available at:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo/Build
I
missed the part about adding a reference to my .build file to the main
galileo.build.
I
imagine most components are using Nick's modeling build and thus have (or can)
easily generate component .build files. In that case, am I correct in saying
that all that remains is letting Rich know, and he'll integrate it into
galileo.build?
Paul
From:
|
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
To:
|
<modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
|
2009-01-08 09:01 AM
|
Subject:
|
[modeling-pmc] Galileo build status
|
Hi All,
With
M4 Galileo builds underway, I notice not all Modeling components that declared
a desire to participate are included in the Galileo build model.
Specifically, I see the following issues:
XSD:
is included, but you may want to change your template used to generate
mdt-xsd.build to have a better label than “EMF” ;)
JET:
was included by me recently to allow STP to board the train. It’s
up-to-date for the JET M4 build and I expect Paul will be updating in the
future?
CDO
& Net4j: recently updated the contact list, but is the content ready for
inclusion in galileo.build?
Teneo:
untouched since my initial port from .sc to .build – is Teneo not on the
Galileo train? Or, can the current emf-teneo.build model be included
as-is? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=253333#c4
Ecore
Tools: same story, only the initial .build model exists. I don’t
see a breakdown of EMFT components to be included here, so can it be created? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=260196
Mint:
on the train and ready to be included?
MWE:
same question
Search:
same question
Xpand:
same question
Xtext:
same question
And
before you indicate your build model is ready to be included, PLEASE verify
your update site and model content is correct. All sites should have p2
metadata repositories and your URL should not end in /site.xml to allow p2 to
bypass this anachronistic method.
Also,
order is important in the Galileo model. Let me know what prereqs you
have so that when I add your contribution to the model it builds properly.
Thanks,
Rich
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc