Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would youlike your Galileo bugs?

Title: Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would youlike your Galileo bugs?
OK, thanks.

As Ed mentioned, nothing prevents you from creating your own clones per-component and managing at the project level the way it’s being done for Galileo.  Technically, we could just provide a single Modeling.Releng contribution to Galileo, along with our rollup plan.xml

- Rich


On 10/31/08 7:41 AM, "Sven Efftinge" <sven@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The only reason I wanted to have separate bugzillas is because I want to see (by bugzilla query) what items are still open and need to be addressed next.
As I cannot close them, when there are still other projects having to address the things in it, it's not that straight forward.
But I'm pretty sure we'll find a decent way to manage that.
So, I'm ok with having bugs for the projects only.

Sven

On Oct 31, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Richard Gronback wrote:

Great.  Now, can we convince Paul to use just M2T-Releng, Frederic to use just M2M-Releng, and Frederic/Sven to use TMF-Releng? ;)
 
 Thanks,
 Rich
 
 
 On 10/31/08 7:24 AM, "Ed Merks" <ed.merks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
 
Rich,
 
 Yes, I'll follow Kenn's lead for EMF and EMFT.  I'll try not to make a habit of that though. :-P   I checked with Sven that he's okay with that for EMFT-MWE...  In fact, component leads could always create "sub" bugs that block the main bug so that we effectively do both while reusing the existing infrastructure.
 
 Cheers,
 Ed
 
 
 Richard Gronback wrote:
 
Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would youlike your Galileo bugs? OK, thanks.
  
 This means we have the following Bugzilla Product-Components to include so far:
  
 GMF-Releng
 EMF-Releng
 M2T-Jet
 M2T-MTL
 M2T-Xpand
 MDT-Releng
 TMF-Xtext
 EMFT-MWE
  
 Ed, care to manage the EMF/EMFT components as Kenn is doing in MDT?  Having just EMF-Releng and EMFT-Releng contributions might be best.
  
 - Rich
  
  
  
 On 10/30/08 4:20 PM, "Kenn Hussey" <Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  
   
 
While I’d like to delegate the work to individual component leads, I’m OK with waiting for a +1 from each of the contributing component/sub-project leads before resolving bugs at the MDT level (we can always assign the bugs to component leads to get their attention). So for MDT, I’d like to go for one set of bugs for MDT (Releng component is fine).
  
 Cheers,
  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  
Kenn Hussey
  Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions
  

  
<image.jpg>
<http://www.embarcadero.com/>
  

  
  
   
  
Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com <http://www.embarcadero.com>  <http://www.embarcadero.com> <http://www.embarcadero.com/>
  82 Peter Street, Second Floor | Toronto, ON  M5V 2G5
  Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Office: 416-593-1585 x9296 Mobile: 613-301-9105
  

  

  
 
From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
  Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:55 PM
  To: PMC members mailing list
  Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would youlike your Galileo bugs?
  

  
Thanks, Christian.  I agree, that would not be a bad approach.
  
 The hope regarding components is that the “I’m a project now, not a component” feature of the portal will be available in the next (OK, like 6) months, which means having them separate now may mean not having to create a bunch later.  Plus, I suspect Kenn will want to delegate to each component the responsibility of maintaining these train bugs.  I guess it’s best left up to the Project Lead to determine what’s best for their project.
  
 Best,
 Rich
  
  
 On 10/30/08 3:49 PM, "Christian W. Damus" <cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 Hi, Rich,
  
 If I were a PMC member, I would vote for project-level bugs (EMF, GMF, M2M, M2T, MDT, etc.) and implement a checklist of the components in each.
  
 As components implement the requirement of a bug, they add their checkmarks.  When all components are accounted for, the bug is resolved.
  
 Nick has implemented this strategy in a number of cross-component releng bugs, and it has always worked well.
  
 Cheers,
  
 Christian
  
  
 On 30-Oct-08, at 3:17 PM, Richard Gronback wrote:
 Hello,
  
  In case you’ve not followed the Planning Council discussion on this year’s train participation requirements, we’re going to track requirements using Bugzilla.  The approach is to create a bug for each requirement, then clone each for each train participant with a dependency on the “master.”
  
  So the question is, what level of granularity do we want in Modeling on these bugs?  Keep in mind, it’s like 20 bugs for each participant you’ll get by signing up.  If we go by our .sc file list last year in Ganymede, it means we’ll need:
  
  EMF
  EMF-CDO
  EMF-Net4j
  EMF-Query
  EMF-Teneo
  EMF-Transaction
  EMF-Validation
  EMFT-Compare
  EMFT-EcoreTools
  EMFT-Mint
  EMFT-Search
  GMF
  M2M-ATL
  M2M-QVTOML
  M2T-JET
  MDT-OCL
  MDT-UML2
  MDT-UML2Tools
  MDT-XSD
  
  I’m not sure if TMF is expecting to be on the train, so Sven/Frederic please let us know.  Also, if any others are planning to join, please pre-announce your intent now (although technically you have until M4).
  
  Thanks,
  Rich
  
  
  ------ Forwarded Message
  From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
  Reply-To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:54:23 -0700
  To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Where would you like your Galileo bugs?
  
  Galileo Leads,
  I am creating all the cloned Galileo bugs as per our discussion at EclipseWorld. Before I do, I'd like to know where you want me to put the bugs for your project(s). Here is the table I have so far:
  
    
    Project   Classification   Product   Component   
    Buckminster   Tools   Buckminster   internal-build   
    CDT   Tools   CDT   cdt-releng   
    DLTK   Technology   DLTK   Common   
    DSDP DD   DSDP   DD   General   
    DSDP TM   DSDP   Target Management   Core   
    DTP   DataTools       releng   
    ECF   RT   ECF   ecf.core   
    Platform   Eclipse   Platform   Releng   
    Equinox   RT   Equinox   Framework   
    EMF   Modeling   EMF   Releng   
    EMFT   Modeling   EMFT   Releng   
    EPP   Technology   EPP   installer   
    GEF   Tools   GEF   releng   
    GMF   Modeling   GMF   Releng   
    MDT   Modeling   MDT   Releng   
    M2M   Modeling   M2M   Releng   
    M2T   Modeling   M2T   Releng   
    TMF   Modeling   TMF   Releng   
    Mylyn   Tools   Mylyn   Core   
    RAP   Technology   RAP   Workbench   
    STP   STP       build.system   
    Subversive   Technology   Subversive   Core   
    TPTP   TPTP   TPTP Release Engineering   Build   
    WTP   WebTools   Web Tools   General   
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
   
  Rich, Ed,
  If you'd like the modeling sub-sub-projects to have their own set of cloned bugs, please let me know which sub-sub-projects and which bugzilla component to file them under - thanks.
  
  - Bjorn
  
  --
  New Page 1
[end of message]
  
     

 
 


 
 
 
  
_______________________________________________
  eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
  eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
  
  IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
  
  ------ End of Forwarded Message
  
  
_______________________________________________
 modeling-pmc mailing list
  modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
  
  
  
--
 Christian W. Damus
 Senior Software Developer, Zeligsoft Inc.
 Component Lead, Eclipse MDT OCL and EMF-QTV
 E-mail: cdamus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  
  
 

   
    

 
 


 
 
 
_______________________________________________
 modeling-pmc mailing list
  modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
  
 

 


_______________________________________________
 modeling-pmc mailing list
  modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
  
 

 

 
 


 _______________________________________________
 modeling-pmc mailing list
 modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
   
 

 

_______________________________________________
 modeling-pmc mailing list
 modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
 

  _______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc



_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc

Back to the top