| Re: [modeling-pmc] Project planning |
Rich,I'm not sure it's a rule or a guideline. :-P I just wanted to be sure that the things I for which I'm directly responsible, EMF Core, SDO, and XSD, did things in a consistent way. Kenn asked for this flag for MDT, and that's where XSD lives, so I wanted to follow this same convention for EMF Core and SDO. As a result, I also wanted all the EMF and EMFT components to be consistent with that as well. It seems like a pretty sound approach and no one complained!
I'm not doing a rolled up EMF or EMFT plan because I was hoping that whatever technology is developed to roll up plans could also be used to roll up the various EMF and EMFT component plans into rolled up plans, then recursively to create a modeling project rolled up plan, and finally an overall Eclipse plan...
Richard Gronback wrote:
I guess this never came up at the PMC level, but are we expecting each Modeling project to use the galileo flag for planning? http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Project_Plan/Modeling_Project Also, should we attempt a rollup of plans for Modeling overall? The Planning Council will need to provide some form of rollup for the community, but we're not sure what that will look like yet. It's a future topic, so I figured I'd solicit feedback from Modeling... Thoughts? Thanks, Rich _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc