[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[modeling-pmc] [CQ 2342] QVT Abstract syntax support
|
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2342
--- Comment #15 from Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-07-14 15:24:08 ---
#1
Confirm removal (to separate CQ).
I've heard back from Sreedhar Reddy twice. He is very happy to apply a
copyright TCS EPL license header. He confirms that all code was written by TCS.
He wants to know how Eclipse IP will contact him for confirmation.
#2
Since this is a review for contribution rather than release, can't the
about.html's be a requirement for the release, rather than checkintocvs? Not
having a CVS makes it increasingly difficult to maintain bug fixes.
#3
"Let's do that now."
I trust that "us" is the Eclipse IP team. It seems you can just raise the three
OMG CQs and put them through your process to ensure that all your checkboxes
are well checked. Perhaps you need a UML2 one and XSD and XML and other W3C
ones too. Have WST done a CQ for every RFC?!
--
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
