| [modeling-pmc] FW: [emf-dev] Re: [m2m-dev] What is a Mini-Deck? :: Action Required (re: Ganymede Release Review Slides) |
As suggested, sending to PMC for review. I added the topic of reviewing the slides to next week's PMC meeting agenda http://wiki.eclipse.org/Modeling_PMC_Meeting%2C_2008-05-20 So, I guess this implies a deadline to have them done by in order for us to consolidate into a single deck, should we agree to do so. Thanks, Rich ------ Forwarded Message From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: Eclipse Modelling Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:59:01 -0400 To: M2M dev list <m2m-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, EMFT Developer Mailing List <emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eclipse Modelling Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, MDT developers <mdt.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Model to Text <m2t-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [emf-dev] Re: [m2m-dev] What is a Mini-Deck? :: Action Required (re: Ganymede Release Review Slides) Well, I already did the GMF slides. How about the last project to complete theirs can combine the rest into a single set for all of Modeling? ;) Go! I think a single set for Modeling would be best. Last year we reviewed each at the PMC. I suppose we can all send them to the PMC mailing list, then we can combine them easily enough. Thanks, Rich On 5/16/08 11:59 AM, "Nick Boldt" <codeslave@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Guys: > > I spoke with Bjorn moments ago, and here's what we need to do to > condense the Ganymede Release Review Slide Deck into a Mini-Deck: > > (2008-05-16 11:34:43) Nick: is there a document describing what needs to > be in a "mini-deck" vs. a "release review slide deck?" > > (2008-05-16 11:35:12) Bjorn: Mini-deck: one or two (or three slides) > highlight how great your project is > (2008-05-16 11:35:43) Bjorn: The idea is that with 30 projects, we'll > make one "summary of the release" deck with 1 or 2 slides per project. > Not "archive quality" but more advertisement. > > (2008-05-16 11:36:13) Nick: like, 3 bullets per slide, max 6-9 bullets > for each of the Modeling projects? > > (2008-05-16 11:37:23) Bjorn: Format: look at the "one minute slides" > from last year: > http://www.eclipse.org/projects/slides/EuropaReleaseReview_06June2007.zip > > (2008-05-16 11:37:50) Nick: are we treating Modeling as one project or > as 6 (EMF, EMFT, M2M, M2T, MDT, GMF) ? > > (2008-05-16 11:38:21) Bjorn: One or Many: for the mini deck it's your > choice: for the big decks, they are separate projects. > > (2008-05-16 11:56:55) Nick: are these minideck slides to be attached to > the decks submitted on June 4? or should they be held separately? > > (2008-05-16 11:57:08) Bjorn: one file is fine, two files is also fine > > (2008-05-16 11:57:56) Nick: and if merged, would the minideck + > "supporting slides / appendix" idea work, in that all the longer stuff > would just be at the back in case people actually read that far? > > (2008-05-16 11:58:09) Bjorn: exactly > > --------- > > So we have the choice of either 1-2 (or three) slides for all of > Modeling in Ganymede (6 projects combined) or one set of 1-2 slides for > each project in Modeling in Ganymede (2-12 slides total). > > Project Leads: which, um, *model*, do people prefer? > > N > _______________________________________________ > m2m-dev mailing list > m2m-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-dev _______________________________________________ emf-dev mailing list emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev ------ End of Forwarded Message
Attachment:
Ganymede Release Review - GMF.pdf
Description: Binary data