[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[modeling-pmc] Re: JCRManagement Project Pre-Proposal
|
Sandro,
I see. That makes sense. I'll have some discussions with a few people and
then likely I'll have some follow-up questions shortly. I'll be interested
in comments from the other PMC members...
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Sandro Böhme
<sandro.boehme@gm
x.de> To
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
01/27/2007 12:33 cc
PM modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: JCRManagement Project
Please respond to Pre-Proposal
sandro.boehme@gmx
.de
Hi Ed,
Apogee's scope are "only" ECM systems while using a fixed domain model.
The scope of the JCRManagement project is to create arbitary domain
models and it is open to every kind of application - not "only" ECM
system. The idea is more to enhance the modelling projects with the
integration of the JCR - similar to the Teneo project which integrates
relational databases with hibernate.
Bye,
Sandro
Ed Merks wrote:
> Sandro,
>
> I did see that, but I didn't follow the discussion link and should have.
> I think this probably argues that the best fit for this proposal would be
> as part of the Apogee project. Does that make sense to you, or are you
> looking for something a little different?
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
>
>
>
>
>
> Sandro Böhme
> <sandro.boehme@gm
> x.de>
To
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> 01/27/2007 11:55
cc
> AM sandro.boehme@xxxxxxxxx,
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
> Please respond to Re: JCRManagement Project
> sandro.boehme@gmx Pre-Proposal
> .de
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> thanks for your feedback. I had the same concerns when I heared about
> Apogee. But I discussed it with them and found out, that they do have a
> more high level scope and that the JCRM project could be useful for
> them. You will find the details about it in the last chapter of my
> proposal. Maybe you missed it as it is quite short. There is also a link
> to the discussion in the mailing list where I still called my project
> JCR Explorer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sandro
>
> PS: You don't need to work on the weekend for this proposal.
>
> --
> https://www.xing.com/profile/Sandro_Boehme
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/sandroboehme
> http://www.wingsuit.de
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>
>>Sandro,
>>
>>This looks very interesting but it immediately raises questions about how
>>this relates to other existing projects and particularly how it relates
>
> to
>
>>Apogee, i.e., http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/apogee/ and
>>http://www.eclipse.org/apogee/. I think there need to be discussions
>>with the Apogee folks because Eclipse will not generally allow two
>
> projects
>
>>with overlapping scope to exist. This issue seems to represent a road
>>block and I'm not sure how that can be resolved.
>>
>>I've added the modeling PMC to the mailing list to solicit the opinions
>
> of
>
>>the PMC as a whole as to whether this proposal fits within the scope our
>>the Modeling project. My sense is that, like the Apogee project, it
>>probably belongs in the Eclipse technology project, and that perhaps it
>>should be part of the Apogee project...
>>
>>
>>Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
>>mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
>>905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>> Sandro Böhme
>
>
>> <sandro.boehme@gm
>
>
>> x.de>
>
> To
>
>> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
>
>
>> 01/25/2007 06:56
>
> cc
>
>> AM sandro.boehme@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Subject
>
>> JCRManagement Project Pre-Proposal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hello Ed,
>>
>>attached you find a pre-proposal of a project that use synergies of EMF
>>and the JCR (JSR-170). Once there is a JCR integration
>>into EMF (and the Eclipse-MDSD world) I personally think this
>>could open a very wide range of possibilities and features for
>>the JCR world and could grow to a very strong community.
>>What do you think, is it possible to integrate the JCR into EMF
>>in the way I planned it (or in an other way)? I'm really
>>looking forward to your opinion!
>>
>>++ Background Details ++
>>I think I should tell you a bit more about my motivation for this
>
> project.
>
>>Since some years I'm leading a small project that uses it's own CMS for
>>a web site. In 2004 I was very excited seeing the JSR-170 started
>>because it addressed problems that we have in our project. This is why I
>> dived into this world in various ways (Graffito Committer Emeritus,
>>Jackrabbit Contributor, JCR Browser Project Lead). In this time I've
>>seen some problems coming up like:
>>o there is no "JCR Browser with editing capabilities",
>>o what can I use as basis for my JCR application,
>>o migrating node types is hard in a 24/7 environment and
>>o mapping of JCR types to Java types is not too easy.
>>In 2005 I started to learn about Model Driven Software Development and
>>later I had a chance to evaluate MDSD frameworks and tools for our
>>company. The result was that Eclipse has good frameworks as a basis and
>>oAW has a good set of M2M and M2T tools. With MDSD and Eclipse know how
>>I think the mentioned JCR problems can be solved quite elegant.
>>o The solution for the "JCR Browser with editing capabilities" could be
>>an exemplary EMF tool.
>>o An JCR ecore model, EMF resource implementations and the exemplary EMF
>>tool could serve as a basis for JCR applications.
>>o Migrating node types can be done type safe with M2M transformations.
>>o For the type mapping the EMF tooling could fit quite good.
>>On top of that I think GMF can add very interesting features for the CMS
>>world. I hope that gives you some background to this project.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Sandro
>>
>>--
>>https://www.xing.com/profile/Sandro_Boehme
>>http://www.linkedin.com/in/sandroboehme
>>http://www.wingsuit.de
>>(See attached file: JCRManagement_V2.doc)
>
>
>
--
https://www.xing.com/profile/Sandro_Boehme
http://www.linkedin.com/in/sandroboehme
http://www.wingsuit.de
