RE: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer

["Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with you both, and we may want to override this terminology in the standard charter.  I re-read it just before sending it out, and it could be interpreted that there is formal approval required:

"If there are at least 3 positive votes and no negative votes within the voting period, the Developer is recommended to the PMC for commit privileges. The PMC may waive the 3 vote minimum requirement in exceptional cases (e.g., there are fewer than 3 active committers on the project). If the PMC also approves, and the Developer signs the appropriate New Committer agreements..."

Although it starts out as "... is recommended to the PMC..." it is followed by "If the PMC also approves..." which to me implied something formal, hence the vote request.

No big deal, as I didn't think anyone would object to our Committer vote results.  In Technology, each Project Lead acts as the PMC in these cases, so doing the same within Modeling would be great, imo.

Thanks,
Rich


-----Original Message-----
From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jean Bezivin
Sent: Sat 10/7/2006 8:47 AM
To: PMC members mailing list
Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
 
Rich,

My interpretation was the same than Ed's,
but we may check that with Bjorn this week.

In case it is necessary, +1 also for me.

Best regards,

Jean


On 10/7/06, Ed Merks <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Rich,
>
> I didn't think the PMC had to vote to approve a decision about committers
> made by a subproject.  I thought only existing committers for that
> subproject or a component of that subproject needed to approve.   I'll ask
> Bjorn about that next week.  I have no basis for deciding to vote yes or no,
> so if we are required to vote, my policy will be to approve the vote of the
> subproject, i.e., to rubber stamp it. :-)
>
> So my vote, if one is necessary, is +1
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265  (t/l 969)
>
>
>
>
>   *"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 10/07/2006 03:38 AM   Please respond to
> PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>    To
> <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>  cc
>   Subject
> [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
>
>
>
>
> This email serves as a summary of a vote taken on the gmf-dev mailing list
> regarding the committer vote for Boris Blajer.
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/gmf-dev/msg00759.html
>
> We have had 11 +1 votes with 0 -1 votes, and the vote has been open for
> greater than the required week, per the standard top-level charter.
>
> We request a vote from the PMC for Boris Blajer to be added as a Committer
> on the GMF project.
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
>
>


-- 
__________________________________
Jean Bézivin - ATLAS Group (INRIA & LINA) - University of Nantes - 2, rue de
la Houssinière
44322 Nantes cedex 3 - France
tel. +33 2 51 12 58 13 - fax. +33 2 51 12 58 12 - cell.+33 6 14 32 22 36
- e.mail: Jean.Bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/lina/atl/ - Skype: jbezivin
---------------------------------------