[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC call agenda items for 8/15
|
Rich,
OK, but I hope someone comes up with
something better (sorry, I'm not so keen on this one). There's a lot to
be said for simplicity... and I'm not so sure it's a good idea to clutter
the logo with names of specific languages/technologies...
Cheers,
Kenn Hussey
Eclipse UML2 Project Lead
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive
Kanata, Ontario, K2V 1C8
T: (613) 599-3980 F: (613) 599-3912
Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/21/2006 09:25 PM
Please respond to
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
| Max Feldman <max.feldman@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stephen Henderson <Stephen.Henderson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Subject
| Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC call agenda items
for 8/15 |
|
I’ve attached the logo I mentioned on
the call. It’s been improved thanks to input from Ed and the talented
Mr. Henderson. I’m waiting for Max to help me with the Mac-inspired
glass/glossy look ;)
If no one objects, I’ll place it on the homepage and announce the logo
contest using Bugzilla as WTP did: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=122593
Thanks,
Rich
On 8/15/06 12:23 PM, "Richard Gronback" <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Here are the notes/actions from today’s
call:
Attendees:
Jean Bezivin
Richard Gronback
Ed Merks
Fred Plante
Kenn Hussey
Stephen Henderson
Absent:
Sebastien Demathieu (holiday)
- The draft top-level plan was discussed,
with all in general agreement:
- Kenn suggested more themes (e.g. Usability,
adopting Phoenix) to be adopted by all Modeling projects. This was
agreeable to all, though update of the wiki with proposed themes is required
[Kenn?]
- The concept of using top-level as holder
of common content (e.g. Release Compatibility) was generally accepted.
- Although +2 week goal is stated in plan,
internal goal for Modeling projects is to achieve continuous integration
with notification for downstream builders. With that, a more formalized
milestone promotion process should be considered for Europa release.
- The Workflow Conventions draft was also
generally agreed to, with the following issues:
- plan keyword should be mandatory, [Plan
Item] prefix is optional. [Rich] to update wiki (done).
- [releng] prefix should be dropped in favor
of a releng component.
- [Duplicate] prefix needs to be looked at
by Nick (along with others) for alternative name (e.g. Clone). Also,
when Nick is comfortable with changes to scripts, we can remove prefixes
from wiki that are no longer in use.
- Jean noted ATL missing from Modeling page.
[Rich] to fix (done).
- M2M proposal still in review, with Peter
(Compuware) expecting to move forward following their current release cycle
(next few weeks).
- M2T proposal in the works, with Markus
& Paul working together.
- The draft proposal Kenn sent out for MDT
was approved by a majority of the PMC (only Sebastien was absent in vote).
[Kenn] will forward to EMO for processing (done).
- Ed raised the issue of possibly utilizing
Java 1.4 bytecode from Java 5 sources for this coming release. More
investigation required.
- Work continues on ‘initial contribution’
logo [Rich & Ed], which will be used to kickoff logo contest (in the
hope that a professional graphic artist will contribute something better
;)
Thanks,
Rich
On 8/10/06 10:01 AM, "Richard Gronback" <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi All,
In advance of next week’s call, can you all please take a look at these
drafts of a Modeling plan and workflow conventions document?:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Modeling_Project_Plan
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Modeling_Project_Workflow_Conventions
These are the result of a thread I started with Ed and finished up with
Nick, who helped on the latter. The idea of the first is to provide
a set of agreed upon process items to aid in generating our project plans,
etc. It’s just a start, and contains some comments/questions already.
The second is a draft proposal for a Modeling Project Plan which is intended
to provide a roll-up of individual project plans, along with some high-level
themes for Modeling during the Europa release cycle. I added some
basic themes we can work on improving/removing/augmenting.
One option is to inherit from this plan in our individual project plans,
similar to what we do with our charter and the standard top-level project
charter. It seems we all copy/paste from the same place anyway, so
why not extract and reference? I figure I can cut our GMF plan (http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Project_Plan)
in half by referencing this one for all the “standard” content.
Other topics to consider on the call:
- Modeling Symposium at Eclipse Summit Europe
(Jean can tell us about this :)
- Status update for MDT, M2M, M2T proposals
- Migration to /modeling status update &
issues
- Update on CVS/build migration and common
infrastructure (Nick and/or Max?)
Please reply with additional items to discuss, if you have them.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
Attachment:
modeling.png
Description: Binary data