[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[modeling-pmc] Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Callisto Mega Release Review
|
Gordon,
Since this will also be your incubation
exit review, you need to do present information to convince folks that
you're ready to exit incubation as described here:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/validation-phase.php
With the other EMFT components, we had
an internal review with the folks on the model-pmc before we went ahead
and asked the EMO for a full public review.
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
----- Forwarded by Ed
Merks/Toronto/IBM on 06/23/2006 06:17 AM -----
| Guo Tong Xie/China/IBM@IBMCN
06/23/2006 03:41 AM
|
|
To
| Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA@IBMAU
|
|
cc
| Lei L Zhang/China/IBM@IBMCN, Yue Pan/China/IBM@IBMCN
|
|
Subject
| Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Callisto Mega Release ReviewLink |
|
Ed,
How are you? Hope everything is going
well. Now we want to complete release review of EODM and some draft review
slides are prepared by Lei Zhang. We'd like to get your instruction on
how to proceed. Thanks.
Regards,
Guo Tong (Gordon) Xie (谢国彤)
Manager, Semantic Integration
IBM China Research Lab
Email: xieguot@xxxxxxxxxx
Notes ID: Guo Tong Xie/China/IBM@IBMCN
Tel: 86-10-58748425 Tieline: 905-8425
Fax: 86-10-58748330
Website: http://iki.crl.ibm.com/st
Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian
District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094
| Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
2006-05-16 01:27
|
|
To
| Frederic Plante/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, Vishwanath
Ramaswamy/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, Paul Elder/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, Christian Damus/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA,
Chris McGee/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
| Dave Steinberg/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, John
Duimovich/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, Guo Tong Xie/China/IBM@IBMCN
|
|
Subject
| Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Callisto
Mega Release Review |
|
Guys,
I assume that all the EMFT components
that are part of Callisto, i.e., OCL, Validation, Query, and Transaction,
will do their own thing. JET will need to do a release review as
well, and we should ensure this is done well ahead of the GA so that IES
can claim to have a released version that has passed its release review.
Same goes for EODM, but since that's not part of IES, Gordon can
set his own deadline; just be sure you don't claim to have a released version
until you've completed your release review.
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
----- Forwarded by Ed
Merks/Toronto/IBM on 05/15/2006 01:22 PM -----
| John Duimovich/Ottawa/IBM
05/15/2006 12:07 PM
|
|
To
| Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,
Kenneth Hussey/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>,
Gili Mendel <gmendel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Shaw/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Callisto Mega Release Review |
|
Tools project leaders,
Sorry about this if this is a repeat
but as a reminder, as per the Eclipse dev process... release reviews are
being for all calisto releases.
Bjorn wants the review slides by Friday...
Template for RR is here.
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/callisto-files/Callisto%20Release%20Review%20template.ppt
in case you forget who does what :)
here are the assuptions I'm making about who is responsible for making
sure the decks are done.
CDT - Doug
EMF, XSD -Ed
UML2 - Kenn
GEF - Steve
VE - Gili
If I have the names wrong and someone
else is doing the charts or if you need any help with the process let me
know,
John
----- Forwarded by John
Duimovich/Ottawa/IBM on 05/15/2006 11:20 AM -----
Bjorn Freeman-Benson <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/13/2006 02:56 PM
|
Please respond to
"eclipse.org-planning-council" |
|
|
To
| "eclipse.org-planning-council"
<eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Callisto Mega Release Review |
|
Callisto People,
A reminder that the Callisto Release Review slides are due (to emo@xxxxxxxxxxx)
by next Friday, May 19th.
A couple people have noted that the template I sent around is much smaller
than the Release Review checklist in the development process (see http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/release-review.php).
You are each still expected to be able to answer all the questions in the
Release Review checklist and it would probably behoove you to prepare a
slide deck with all those answers - the same way we have done for previous
individual release reviews. In fact, I strongly recommend that you do (probably
should have *required* that you do, but it's too late for me to change
the rules now). After you've got that slide deck prepared, please make
it available on your project website and put the URL to it in the three
or four slides you are sending me for the mega Release Review. Thanks.
--
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
Attachment:
EODM 1.0 Release Review.ppt
Description: Binary data
