[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [modeling-pmc] Grouping on front page
|
Right, it looks like a TM symbol in the editor. I've
removed it, thanks.
- Rich
I believe MDDi is MDA-oriented and
GMT is related to QVT, and as such I think they should stay on the standards
side of things (at the very least this will be consistent with the charter). I
also noticed an 'a' superscript on UML... was this intended to be a trademark
symbol? Cheers, Kenn Hussey
Eclipse UML2 Project Lead
Rational
Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive
Kanata, Ontario, K2V
1C8
T: (613) 599-3980 F: (613) 599-3912
Frederic
Plante/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent
by: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/11/2006 05:18 PM
|
Please respond
to
PMC members mailing list |
|
|
To
| PMC members mailing list
<modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [modeling-pmc]
Grouping on front page |
|
I agree with you that the charter does not dictate
the website layout, dividing along the "Industry Standards" versus
"Infrastructure" as you suggest seems like a good compromise.
I see no issue with MDDi and
GMT on the infrastructure side.
The reason JET is not grouped with MOF2Text in the
charter is because the former is not about an industry standard while the latter
is.
Thanks
-
Fred
_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational
Software, IBM Software Group
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/11/2006 04:56 PM
|
Please respond
to
PMC members mailing list |
|
|
To
| "PMC members
mailing list" <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [modeling-pmc]
Grouping on front page |
|
Well, I'm reluctant
to add that diagram to the website until all of its projects are real (or at
least proposed). Plus, I don't think the charter is intended to dictate
the layout/organization of a website, as it may be best to provide alternative
categorizations/navigation (3D would be nice ;-).
One thing I noticed
earlier regarding the diagram is that it has JET in the wrong location. It
should be with MOF2Text in model transformation. Plus, I'm not sure what
"Industry Standards" are used in MDDi and GMT?
So, how about what's
posted now? Another option is to simply combine "Infrastructure" and
"Technology and Research Projects" into just "Infrastructure". As it is,
we have projects listed that are actually components of other projects.
So, there will need to be a lot of process steps to get us to where this
page indicates we are at already.
- Rich
From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frederic
Plante
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:35 PM
To: PMC members
mailing list
Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] Grouping on front
page
Yep,
that would be enough. We could even add the charter's diagram as well, quick and
cheap way to add graphical content to our site until we add a GMF Component
diagram ! :-)
Thanks
-
Fred
_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational
Software, IBM Software Group
Ed
Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by:
modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/11/2006 04:28 PM
|
Please respond
to
PMC members mailing list |
|
|
To
| PMC members
mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: [modeling-pmc]
Grouping on front page |
|
Fred,
Perhaps if we had two main
groups like the two groups in the charter diagram, with the bottom group first,
and then had subgroups within that just like in the charter, that might be good.
Is that what you had in mind?
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto:
merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Frederic
Plante/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by:
modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/11/2006 04:16 PM
|
Please respond
to
PMC members mailing list |
|
|
To
| modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [modeling-pmc] Grouping
on front page |
|
Rich, Ed,
Kenn,
I noticed
we started adding content to our main web page by grouping projects (BTW thanks
Rich). As we experienced in our Ottawa meeting, the projects can be split in
many different ways, each with their own pros and cons. Given we already agreed
on the charter to a particular split, mainly around standards versus
infrastructure, I would like to suggest we just follow the charter to avoid
having that discussion again. :-)
Thanks
-
Fred
_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational
Software, IBM Software Group
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc
mailing
list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc
mailing
list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc
mailing
list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc
mailing
list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
