Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mobile-iwg] Pulsar participation and dependency on MTJ

As the token "user representative", I think this is an important decision.  Having all of my tools in one place is my ultimate goal whether they are MIDP or not.  I think it gets a bit more interesting for non-Java environments, but for something like Blackberry, I think this is appropriate.

Craig

On 5/7/09 6:50 PM, Christian Kurzke wrote:
Summarizing a decision from today's conference call:


The Galileo Pulsar package will be a pre-packaged download/install version of Eclipse with MTJ included.

We decided in the call, that the participating (and listed in the quick-install view) SDKs   SHOULD integrate with MTJ, but this is not an exclusive criteria.

If an SDK (e.g. RIM) is valuable for Mobile developers,  but does not  integrate with MTJ (and rather use custom plug-ins extending e.g. JDT), the Steering Committee can
grant an exception and allow the inclusion of non-MTJ SDKs in the list of available SDKs.



In this case, the user-experience will be that "Projects" created with MTJ are not compatible with the 3rd party SDK, and the vendor will have to document
how to switch from the default MTJ development perspective to the custom SDK perspective (if needed).


-Christian Kurzke


_______________________________________________
mobile-iwg mailing list
mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-iwg

Back to the top