Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mmt-dev] QVTo IP Log (was Re: Vote for Committer status for Ed Willink was started by Radomil Dvorak)

Your ethics are intact, assuming that the contribution actually ended up in the project's repository :-)

Can you open a bug against "Community/IP Log Tool" regarding the size mismatch?

Wayne

On 06/05/2012 04:31 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne

The Portal seems to have moved on a step so that I am now a committer, so we just need to sort out the IP.

As instructed, I have marked the attachments as iplog+, although I'm not quite sure of the ethics of adjusting my own historic IP contributions.

Running the IP log shows the extra Bug, but as 12877 bytes, rather than the 1.47 MB zipped size/ 3.8MB unzipped (isn't autogeneration bloat wonderful).

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 05/06/2012 20:45, Wayne Beaton wrote:
It's not bookkeeping detail. Committer elections, like everything else, need to be done in an open and transparent manner. Part of this is an transparent demonstration of merit when nominating a new committer.

That part was omitted. I added it.

The election was sidetracked, but I brought it back on track.

The IP Log issue is separate and needs to be addressed.

Wayne

On 06/05/2012 02:50 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne

I think this has got very confused. The election seems to be side tracked by some bookkeeping detail.

Who do you think should do what?

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 05/06/2012 19:43, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I got my list off the IP Log.

This one is not represented because nothing in the bug is marked iplog+. One or more of the attachments needs to be so marked. And then you should probably respin the IP Log :-)

Wayne

On 06/05/2012 02:24 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne

You missed my main contribution

Bug 236128 - QVT Operational Models Contribution from UMLX

which provides 11 of the 30 plugins in QVTo's CVS.

These debugged the models from the OMG QVT 1.0 specification and in conjunction with the models in the QVTd project became the basis for the OMG QVT 1.1 specification. However, my understanding is that Borland were using a pragmatic version of the models and so migration to my contribution remains a plan.

     Regards

        Ed Willink

On 04/06/2012 22:09, Wayne Beaton wrote:
A committer nomination must include some discussion of the individual's contributions to the project.

Minimally, this tends to be a list of high-quality (i.e. accepted) patches contributed by the individual. In Ed's case, you should have cited the following:

Bug 248862  EBoolean features without defaults are not serialised when false Unit tests updates
Bug 253970  platform: references from AST are restrictive Fix for platform: serialisation
Bug 262443 QVT OML Model updates for M5 Cumulative patch for M5 problems

FWIW, with this message, I have provided the demonstration of merit and the election can, IHMO, continue. The PMC may have a different opinion (and theirs is the one that matters).

Wayne

On 06/03/2012 05:41 AM, portal on behalf of Radomil Dvorak wrote:
modeling.mmt.qvt-oml Committers,
This automatically generated message signals that Radomil Dvorak has
nominated Ed Willink as a Committer on the modeling.mmt.qvt-oml project.
The reason given is as follows:

Ed Willink has expressed interest in getting committer status on QVTo


The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
portal for the votes to be properly recorded.  The voting will continue
until either all 3 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
one week). Because there are three or fewer existing Committers, they must
all vote and vote +1 for a successful election.

Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
correctly recorded unless you use the portal):

    http://portal.eclipse.org/

The project Committers eligible to vote are:

    Sergey Boyko
    Radomil Dvorak
    Aleksandr Igdalov

*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be
expired, regardless of its current status.  Should papework processing on
the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
have to be held.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
mmt-dev mailing list
mmt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mmt-dev


--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects


_______________________________________________
mmt-dev mailing list
mmt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mmt-dev


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5044 - Release Date: 06/04/12



--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5048 - Release Date: 06/05/12


--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5048 - Release Date: 06/05/12


--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects

Back to the top