[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [mdt-sbvr.dev] Re: The kernel of SBVR without programmingconsiderations 2008-05-31-2112
|
Dave wrote:
> Then the SBVR 1.0 metamodel and SBVR.xsd are incorrect
Incorrect, or inconsistent? Can you please explain? Wherein lies the error
or inconsistency?
Stan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mdt-sbvr.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mdt-sbvr.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Carlson
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:14 PM
> To: 'SBVR developer list'
> Subject: RE: [mdt-sbvr.dev] Re: The kernel of SBVR without
> programmingconsiderations 2008-05-31-2112
>
> Then the SBVR 1.0 metamodel and SBVR.xsd are incorrect and need to be
> changed in the RTF...
>
> > An XMI interchange file per clause 13.6 expresses facts. See
> > 13.1.1 where it says "A model is a representation of facts."
> > Also see 13.1.2, where it says that "A MOF-based SBVR Model
> > ... represents a fact model ...."
> >
> > For example, from 13.6.1, the line:
> >
> > <sbvr:vocabulary xmi:id="vocabulary"/>
> >
> > ... asserts a fact that "there exists a vocabulary" and gives
> > it an XMI id called "vocabulary"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-sbvr.dev mailing list
> mdt-sbvr.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-sbvr.dev
>
