[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [mdt-sbvr.dev] SBVR Metamodel
|
Dave Carlson wrote:
> ...we must assure that these structures can be loaded/saved from
> compliant XMI. That's why I created a separate project plan item for XMI
> compliance.
Shouldn't we do this XMI plan item before we do the tool and tool metamodel?
A separate, reusable SBVR XMI reader/writer/validator that all tool vendors
would use with their different tools and tool metamodels could be the most
important contribution of this project.
Stan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mdt-sbvr.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mdt-sbvr.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark H Linehan
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:30 AM
> To: SBVR developer list
> Subject: RE: [mdt-sbvr.dev] SBVR Metamodel
>
> Dave said:
>
> > I would also add that we should agree on the
> > importance of XMI serialization that is compliant with the SBVR
> > specification. The metamodel design may be modified to assist tool
> design,
> > but we must assure that these structures can be loaded/saved from
> compliant
> > XMI. That's why I created a separate project plan item for XMI
> compliance.
>
> I certainly agree with this statement.
> --------------------------------
> Mark H. Linehan
> STSM, Model Driven Business Transformation
> IBM Research
>
> phone: (914) 945-1038 or IBM tieline 862-1038
> internet: mlinehan@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-sbvr.dev mailing list
> mdt-sbvr.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-sbvr.dev
>
